1. I was alone.
  2. I have been alone.

Does the second sentence mean that my being "alone" has stopped now, and I am not alone in the present moment?

What is semantic difference between them? I know one is simple past and latter is present perfect. I think it has to do something with time.

  • 1
    The first was completed in the past and no longer applies. The second was the case in the past and may be the case now. (I'm not sure this is the right forum for a question like this, though.) – ralph.m Dec 6 '18 at 7:46
  • Can you suggest me a right forum. – Manish Kumar Balayan Dec 6 '18 at 7:49
  • 2
    Sure. Try this one: ell.stackexchange.com – ralph.m Dec 6 '18 at 7:51

The first sentence refers to the completed past event. The event is not going on now. The second sentence may refer either to the noncompleted event which is going on now or the completed event with the present result. So the main difference is in the connection of the event /action or state/ with the present moment. - I was alone but now l'm not. - l've been alone and it pains me a lot.

  • So in second case, we cannot be sure of whether action is completed or not. – Manish Kumar Balayan Dec 6 '18 at 9:11
  • That's right. We need some context. If there was some reference of duration / for... or since.../, we would definitely know about the process. But we are not sure about the completion of the process /are you still alone?/. – user307254 Dec 6 '18 at 9:36
  • Please cite your sources. – Kris Dec 6 '18 at 11:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.