Someone says:

Don't take it personally, Clem, they're merely laughing at
the juxtaposition of someone as strong-willed as you
being forced into dressing up like a chicken.

What does this mean? juxtaposition means "the fact of putting things that are not similar next to each other" but I am confused when I read this sentence.

  • Can you cite the source? Also, preferably the broader context as well.
    – Kris
    Nov 17, 2018 at 12:38
  • 1
    This is a poor use of the word. A photograph, say, of Clem chairing a board meeting next to one of him in his chicken outfit would be a juxtaposition.
    – KarlG
    Nov 17, 2018 at 14:20
  • @KJO It seems Clem is a girl.
    – Kris
    Nov 19, 2018 at 7:40

2 Answers 2


Actually, juxtaposition means:

the fact of two things being seen or placed close together with contrasting effect.
(emphasis mine)

A strong-willed person is not likely to be forced to dress up like a chicken - hence the contrast.

  • However, the sentence structure does not seem to suit this parsing.
    – Kris
    Nov 17, 2018 at 12:39
  • @Kris Please leave me alone. Nov 17, 2018 at 12:51

We have to start with a definition of juxtapose in its literary sense. The Oxford English Dictionary does not include the idea of dissimilarity in its definition. It the derivation as the cognate French juxtaposer, giving the literal meaning of placing (Mediaeval Latin positio) beside (Latin iuxta)

Literarydevices.net offers a good definition as follows.

“Juxtaposition is a literary technique in which two or more ideas, places, characters, and their actions are placed side by side in a narrative or a poem, for the purpose of developing comparisons and contrasts.”

They give as one example a passage from Romeo and Juliet rich in juxtaposition, including both comparison and contrast

O, she doth teach the torches to burn bright! It seems she hangs upon the cheek of night Like a rich jewel in an Ethiope’s ear;”

Shakespeare compares two similar things: Juliette’s shining beauty and the bright lights of the ball. He puts the brightness of her beauty standing out in contrast with the metaphorical cheek of (dark) night beside the equally contrasted brightness of a rich jewel against the (equally dark) Ethiope’s ear.

There is no doubting that the ‘juxtaposition’ in the quotation of the question is one of contrast, or, rather, of incongruity. What is said to be incongruous is the idea that Clem is strong-willed, set against the idea of his putting up with being made to dress as a chicken. From what the questioner has given us, it looks more like good-humoured fun than a mocking humiliation. So the word “forced” is unlikely to be meant literally.

There is a way in which this use is ‘stretched’. The author is not juxtaposing ‘two or more objects’. S/he is juxtaposing people’ experience of Clem’s strong will with (presumably) the weakness of Clem’s allowing himself to be made to make a fool of himself.

Does this involve a grammatical mistake? In a way it does: as has been said, it does describe a juxtaposition of A with B. But I am tempted to say that the word “juxtaposition” is redundant as well as clumsy. At best the reader is forced to go back over the sentence to check.

... the sight of someone as strong-willed as you being forced ...

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.