0

I'm not sure who is stabbed and who is snarling here.

" Ralf launched himself like a cat; stabbed, snarling, with the spear, and the savage doubled up."

Thanks in advance

  • 2
    The guy who doubled up. Because he was stabbed. – Dan Bron Nov 14 '18 at 13:22
  • 2
    Ralf stabbed with the spear [while] snarling. – Kate Bunting Nov 14 '18 at 13:33
  • The use of that semicolon is ungrammatical. What follows it is not an independent clause nor is the semicolon being used to separate list items that contain commas. – Jason Bassford Nov 14 '18 at 16:59
4

It certainly could be more clearly said, but I would read this as the "savage" has been stabbed, resulting in their "doubling up." The actions "stabbed," and "snarling, with the spear," are a list of the things Ralf did after "launch(ing) himself like a cat."

0

This is a quote from Chapter 12 of the novel "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding.

Here's some context from about 3 paragraphs before your quote:

Ralph fastened his hands round the chewed spear and his hair fell. Someone was muttering, only a few yards away toward the Castle Rock. He heard a savage say "No!" in a shocked voice; and then there was suppressed laughter. He squatted back on his heels and showed his teeth at the wall of branches. He raise [sic] his spear, snarled a little, and waited.

Ralph attacks again at the time of your quote, about 3 paragraphs after this:

A smallish savage was standing between him and the rest of the forest, a savage striped red and white, and carrying a spear. He was coughing and smearing the paint about his eyes with the back of his hand as he tried to see through the increasing smoke. Ralph launched himself like a cat; stabbed, snarling, with the spear, and the savage doubled up.

We can parse the word snarling in the last sentence (which is also your quote) as a parenthetical, so that it's Ralph doing the stabbing with the spear, snarling as he does so.

  • It's a nice answer and all, nicely presented. But do we need it? It draws the same conclusion. For a dubiously-topical question. – Dan Bron Nov 15 '18 at 16:49
  • @DanBron Short answer: no. – Lawrence Nov 15 '18 at 16:56
  • Long answer: When I read the bare quote initially, I wasn't sure the sentence was well-formed. Then I wondered whether it was stabbing with the spear and (simultaneously) with the savage doubled up, whatever that meant. After I found out that it was a quote from a famous novel and got around to documenting this, I thought it was worth noting that the structure wasn't simply a list of 4 things post- semicolon as the other answer suggests. It was one action interrupted by a parenthetical and followed by the result. The OP didn't ask about the result, but the rest was interesting enough to note. – Lawrence Nov 15 '18 at 16:56
  • 1
    @Lawrence Thank you for clarifying in details. Appreciate it 👌👌👌👌💐💐💐 – FARLINGO Nov 15 '18 at 17:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.