As far as I know, it is the only word where wo is pronounced as wee. What is the reason for this? Does it have to do with the origin of the word?

  • 30
    I'd say it's pronounced as "wi" (with a short "i"), rather than "wee". Nov 4, 2010 at 11:58
  • 1
    If you say "wee-man" you will be immediately identified as a non-native speaker. That's one of the most common difficulties I hear, that short "i" sound. Nov 9, 2015 at 11:19

4 Answers 4


Etymonline explains:

late O.E. wimman (pl. wimmen), lit. "woman-man," alteration of wifman (pl. wifmen), a compound of wif "woman" (see wife) + man "human being" (in O.E. used in ref. to both sexes; see man). Cf. Du. vrouwmens "wife," lit. "woman-man." The formation is peculiar to English and Dutch. Replaced older O.E. wif, quean as the word for "female human being." The pronunciation of the singular altered in M.E. by the rounding influence of -w-; the plural retains the original vowel.

Emphasis added.

  • 8
    I should say that every time the pronunciation of women comes up, someone inevitably links to ghoti, so I might just as well do it myself, adding right away that the most important part of that article is the explanation why it cannot be pronounced as fish.
    – RegDwigнt
    Nov 4, 2010 at 11:10
  • 1
    actually, it doesn't (contain such an explanation). The section was removed in February, as it was original research (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OR) and not allowed by Wikipedia's rules.
    – Colin Fine
    Aug 9, 2011 at 14:22
  • 2
    @Colin Fine - Well then, perhaps it should be added to a question/answer set here. Then it could be added back into Wikipedia as a reference to our site, as it would no longer be original research. :-)
    – T.E.D.
    Nov 2, 2011 at 21:42
  • 1
    @T.E.D. : actually, no it couldn't, since our site would not count as reliable. Find a published source that makes this (good) point, and it can go into both WP and here.
    – Colin Fine
    Nov 3, 2011 at 10:02
  • 3
    @RegDwigнt — A bit late, but the wiki article now has a mention to this article that voices your criticism of ghoti. Of course, it doesn't diminish the fact that English spelling makes less sense than a chimp on speed reciting Shakespeare in Swahili.
    – oerkelens
    Sep 2, 2014 at 19:39

Well, here in the Midwest of the US, we don't pronounce it 'wee'.

In the singular form, 'woman', we use a sound similar to the word "wool". The IPA is: `wʊ̈-mən.

In the plural form, 'women', we use the pronunciation that RedDwight has in his answer, with a sound similar to the word 'it' or 'win'. The IPA is: `wɪ-mən.

So, in neither case does a long "e" sound.

  • 1
    Yeah, the American pronunciation is /ˈwɪmən/, and the Received Pronunciation is /ˈwɪmɪn/. The New Zealand pronunciation is particularly interesting, see e.g. here.
    – RegDwigнt
    Nov 6, 2010 at 12:29
  • wɪ-'mən in Canada (source: Gage Canadian Dictionary) Mar 8, 2012 at 13:31
  • 1
    @RegDwight: you shouldn't trust dictionaries on whether the pronunciation of unaccented syllables in American English is /ɪ/ or /ə/. This varies by dialect even more than most American pronunciation. American Heritage has /ˈwɪmɪn/. Jul 5, 2012 at 22:00

I was prompted to reopen this question by the appearance of this very similar question Why is “women” pronounced as wimin?

Further to the answer by RegDwigнt (Nov 4 '10 at 9:55), I find that reply unsatisfactory in a couple of respects.

1. Examine the following from Etymology Online:

'woman late O.E. wimman (pl. wimmen), lit. "woman-man"'

That makes no sense. If woman means woman-man then perforce woman-man means woman-woman-man and woman-woman-man means woman-woman-woman-man.

2. We are also told:

'The pronunciation of the singular altered in M.E. by the rounding influence of -w-; the plural retains the original vowel.'

This is a non-explanation. Why doesn't the rounding influence of -w- also affect the plural?

My tentative answer

Given that the question is 'What is the reason for this?' I think more explanation is needed.

Here is a partial explanation that I put forward as a hypothesis.

Given the Old English words O.E. wimman (sing.) and wimmen (pl.) we can say the following.

At the time those words were in common use, the majority of people were illiterate, they wouldn't have been aware of spelling differences. They would have spoken and heard the words only.

With the transition from OE to ME there would be a tendency, as in modern English, for the words to be stressed on the first syllable and for the final syllable to degenerate towards a neutral or schwa sound. If that happened then both would have /mən/ as the final sound regardless of the pronunciation of the first syllable.

In other words the two would sound identical wimmən (sing.) and wimmən (pl.)

Now these words would have been in common daily use and it would have been intolerable to be unable to distinguish between singular and plural. It would also have been uncomfortable and unnatural to always clearly enunciate the second unstressed syllable.

I therefore suggest that a difference in the sound of the first syllable was bound to evolve. The fact that the plural version retained the original sound (from wifman) and the singular version moved away from it was arbitrary. It could have worked the other way around.

We could bring in here the 'rounding influence of -w-' and hazard that the singular word was commoner and therefore more susceptible to the rounding effect. The plural would then keep its original form simply out of necessity.

If that is what was meant by Etymology Online then all well and good.


I am not an authority on Old English or Middle English or their pronunciation. My answer has at best the status of an educated guess.

I have given it to move things forward because I don't believe any of the other answers so far have addressed the heart of the matter.

If anyone can prove me wrong then I shall be as interested as if I can be proved right.


I think because woman and women would historically be pronounced alike, based on how English is generally pronounced (although we know the English language has far more exceptions than rules insofar as spelling, stress, pronunciation, etc., etc., etc., unlike virtually any other languages on the planet, all of which are filled with strict rules and few exceptions...).

Is it not possible that in order to make the plural sound different, the odd wi'min variation became common?

Finally, how about woh'muhn (woman) singular, and woh'min (women) plural? I've clearly heard these pronunciations among Brooklynites, New York, and even more often I've heard American Blacks (from Brooklyn, too, and possibly elsewhere in the U.S.), who pronounce the plural almost like the singular.

Thank you in advance for your feedbacks.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.