I’ve just come across this sentence.

“Only an Albert Einstein could have the wisdom to reject an offer to become President of Israel because he argued that he did not have enough experience in working with human beings.”

In this context, what does the phrase “Only an Albert Einstein” mean?

I’m well aware that the indefinite article can be used before a proper noun, and that the meaning is usually ‘a person who is similar to the referent of the proper noun.’

But the example above is a bit tricky for me. The writer chose the past tense, and so it seems that he/she is really refering to the Albert himself.

  • 'Only an Albert Einstein could have seen that E=mc^2.' The sentence still has meaning even when AE himself is being spoken of. Only someone of the same calibre as he, could have done what he did. – Nigel J Oct 3 '18 at 12:46
  • The word could (and the sentence in which it appears) is not necessarily the past tense. In fact, could can be considered "agnostic" when it comes to tense. – Jason Bassford Oct 3 '18 at 22:09

A well-known person, when epitomized/ objectified with an article before the name, refers to the epitome or the object itself.

An Albert Einstein = A person of Albert Einstein's kind/ caliber/ stature ...


| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.