I am looking for a word that would describe a concept or activity, such as playing a game X, that is1 neither boring nor interesting. In other words, it should mean ‘neutral’ wrt intrestingness (~ boringness) but still comparable on the scale of intrestingness to both ‘boring’ and ‘interesting’.

An example sentence would be

As far as I'm concerned, long-distance running is [insert word]; it is not boring but it's also not interesting.


  1. Has to be unambiguous3, and may consist of two words at most.
  2. Has to be a single word.
  3. Should be formal in the sense that it is included in Cambridge Dictionary, or Merriam Webster, or both.
  4. Should not contain negating prefixes, such as ‘un-’.

Does such a word exist in the English language?

For readers' convenience, please state which criteria you believe your word suggestion has met. You may do so, e.g., by adding a disclaimer at the top or bottom of your answer. Simply writing (1., 2.) is sufficient.

1 Assume a ternary system of intrestingness.

2 If not all criteria can be met, you may relax the requirements from bottom to top, in the following order: 4. -> 3. -> 2. -> 1. Answers with the smallest number of relaxed criteria in this order will be preferred in accepting. For example, fulfilling (1., 2., 3.) is better than achieving (1., 3., 4.). Situations where a higher priority ordering fulfills fewer criteria than a lower priority vector, such as (1.) vs (3., 4.), will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

3 Words such as ‘unappealing’ thus even fail criterium 1 because in a three-valued system ‘unappealing’ ~ ‘not appealing’ ~ ‘not interesting’ can be taken to mean either ‘boring’ or ‘neutral wrt intrestingness’.

  • Criteria 4 seems rather arbitrary – Orangesandlemons Sep 16 '18 at 13:32
  • @Orangesandlemons I appreciate your feedback. It is there mostly as a precaution as per footnote 3. To be unambiguous in our three-valued system, the prefix ‘un-’ must negate a word or term that means ‘interesting or boring’. It seemed quite unlikely that such a word existed. But I could be wrong, or the prefix ‘un-’ could also be used in front of a word it is not negating. – Linear Christmas Sep 16 '18 at 13:48
  • 1
    Points 1 and 2 directly contradict each other. Can it be two words or does it have to be a single word? You can't claim both at the same time. If you're merely asking for "hundreds" of submissions, each tagged with the criteria they meet, then this question is off topic. And why are you hiding text in spoiler code? – Jason Bassford Sep 16 '18 at 15:26
  • @JasonBassford I'm not sure what you mean by direct contradiction. Point 1 says "may consist of two words at most", and point two says "must consist of exactly one word". The latter is a subset of the former; their intersection is "exactly one word". The points 1 and 2 is not equivalent to just requiring a single word because I allowed for not meeting criteria in the order from bottom to top according to footnote 2. (1/2) – Linear Christmas Sep 16 '18 at 15:36
  • 1
    Perhaps the term middle-of-the-road! "If you describe something or someone as middle-of-the-road, you mean that they are ordinary or unexciting". (collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/middle-of-the-road) – mahmud koya Sep 16 '18 at 15:49

Bland may be what you are looking for, although it is generally used with the connotation of being boring https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bland

  • Thank you for your answer. I had thought of ‘bland’ myself but it does indeed usually mean ‘uninteresting’ which would, in my hypothetical case, imply either boring or neutral wrt intrestingness. – Linear Christmas Sep 16 '18 at 13:54

What about tolerable especially in the second meaning below or its synonyms endurable or bearable?



1.capable of being tolerated; endurable: His arrogance is no longer tolerable.
2.fairly good; not bad. 

Long distance running is tolerable.

Another possibility is mediocre

1. of only ordinary or moderate quality; neither good nor bad;
barely adequate: The car gets only mediocre mileage, but it's fun to drive.

The game was neither boring nor interesting; it was mediocre.


meh According to Merriam Webster, meh is:

—used to express indifference or mild disappointment

First Known Use of meh: 1992


1 : not impressive : so-so ·a meh documentary

2 : apathetic, indifferent ·the movie left me feeling meh

The Oxford English Dictionary also lists meh, with definition very similar to that of M-W. However, the OED suggest an earliest use of "1928 or earlier." Meh has made it into the NY Times, as quoted by the OED:

2012 N.Y. Times (National ed.) 1 Nov. b13/1 Who else could they root for? The Chicago Bulls? Impossible. The Boston Celtics? Unconscionable. The team in New Jersey? Meh

and into other mainstream publications

2010 Time Out N.Y. 20 May 52/1 While this seems like an also-ran collection..even meh Picasso is better than a lot of the stuff out there.

The word is often uttered with a shrug of the shoulders and a deprecating expression on the face. I always assumed that the origin of meh was Yiddish, and was surprised to find, in meh, Wikipedia that its origin is speculative:

The origin is unknown. Some have speculated that the term's origin is Yiddish because of its similarity to the interjection "feh",[3] which appears in the 1936 Yiddish song Yidl Mitn Fidl. In Alexander Harkavy's "Yiddish-English-Hebrew Dictionary" the word is treated as a bleating or baa sound. Hooray for Yiddish, by Leo Rosten uses the word "mnyeh", which is speculated to be an early variant of "meh".

  • This would have been the answer I'd have given, but OP said they were looking for a "formal" word. – Laurel Sep 16 '18 at 22:30
  • What's not formal with meh? :) – ab2 Sep 16 '18 at 22:32
  • It seems to be 'formal enough' for Merriam Websters. A bit meh, but I'm upvoting. – S Conroy Sep 16 '18 at 22:55
  • This isn't a word that most people would know, only young people into internet slang. – tchrist Sep 17 '18 at 0:23

Something that isn’t boring and isn’t interesting? Sounds like inner peace/Zen Buddhism to me!








Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.