4

While elaborating on the arrangement between Mr. Darcy and Mr. Wickham in her letter to her niece Elizabeth Bennet, Mrs. Gardiner mentions the following:

...His debts are to be paid, amounting, I believe, to considerably more than a thousand pounds, another thousand in addition to her own settled upon her, and his commission purchased...

I realize that this means that Mr. Darcy, in addition to other incentives, had offered Mr. Wickham a sum of thousand pounds to marry Lydia but how exactly do this meaning fit into the line "another thousand in addition to her own settled upon her", especially the phrase "her own settled upon her", I am not entirely certain

If someone would be kind enough to provide the word-by-word explanation of the above mentioned line and phrase in terms of grammar (For example, what does her own and her refer to here, and how and for whom are they used; basically I want to build sentences like these so I need to know how everything fits), it would be a great help.

  • 2
  • storyandhistory.com/2009/03/… – bookmanu Aug 13 '18 at 13:56
  • 1
    Are you concerned about the cultural situation or about grammar? Grammatically, I think that "another thousand in addition to her own settles upon her" is eliding something after 'her own'. She also has money, 'her own' money. And the wording implies it is a thousand also because of 'another thousand ... in addition'. Whether this is a debt of hers too to Mr. Wickham or the value of the dowry (brideprice) that Wickham would lose because Elizabeth is part of the property exchange to Darcy, that is a matter for late 18th c UK legal experts. – Mitch Aug 13 '18 at 15:30
  • Another thousand [pounds] in addition to her own [money are to be] settled upon her (?) – Kate Bunting Aug 14 '18 at 8:48
1

The important phrase here is “settled upon her”. The appropriate sense is:

settle, v. V.30.b. To secure (property, succession) to, on or upon (a person) by means of a deed of settlement.

Oxford English Dictionary.

The effect of a deed of settlement is that the beneficial owner of the property (here, Lydia Wickham) is not allowed to sell it or dispose of it in her will. She will receive the income from the property during her life, and the property will pass to her children upon her death. The total property thus settled will amount to £2,000. If the assets are able to realise five per cent, then her annual income will be £100: enough to live on, if the Wickhams are very frugal, or to supplement Mr. Wickham’s army salary. (A farm labourer of the period might earn about £20 a year.)

The reason that the property was ‘settled’ on Lydia in this fashion, rather than simply given to her, was to prevent Mr. Wickham from squandering it. Prior to the Married Women’s Property Act (1870) a woman in England lost control over her property when she married. Her personal property became her husband’s, and she could not rent or sell her land without her husband’s permission. Mr. Darcy knows Mr. Wickham’s character too well to trust him to look after Lydia’s property without tying it up in law.

The £2,000 of property settled on Lydia is worked out as follows. “Another thousand in addition” comes from Mr. Darcy, and the first £1,000 are “her own”. But what “her own” actually means is her prospective share of Mrs. Bennet’s marriage portion. Mr. Gardiner writes to Mr. Bennet as follows (chapter 49):

All that is required of you is, to assure to your daughter, by settlement, her equal share of the five thousand pounds secured among your children after the decease of yourself and my sister; and, moreover, to enter into an engagement of allowing her, during your life, one hundred pounds per annum.

The narrator confirms this:

Five thousand pounds was settled by marriage articles on Mrs. Bennet and the children.

This property is also tied up, by a marriage settlement, so that Mr. Bennet cannot sell it to realise the capital. Instead, he must pay Lydia her share of the proceeds during his lifetime, and arrange in his will to settle Lydia’s share of the property on her upon his (and his wife’s) death. The sum of £100 per year seems rather more than the realistic returns on £1,000 of property, so presumably it includes an element of personal allowance.

protected by Mitch May 22 at 18:38

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.