0

Can I omit the subject if it has been mentioned in a preceding sentence?

For example, is the phrase inside the parentheses necessary in the below?:

The sculpture A exhibits degradation at a seemingly increased rate from 30 years ago. However, the surrounding environment is considered not to have changed at a significant level since (the sculpture was) carved.

  • Your sentence, as it stands, means that the environment was carved. Which is not what you wanted to say. – Nigel J Aug 10 '18 at 12:05
5

In a word: no. You have to have a pronoun or other noun here: “since it was carved”. You can usually omit the subject in the context “Subject predicate and predicate” (e.g., “Sculpture A exhibits degradation and is a cause for concern”), but adjuncts do not permit this kind of subject omission (e.g., you can’t say “Sculpture A exhibits degradation because _ was poorly conserved / since _ was moved / etc.”).

Also, I wouldn’t use the definite article at the start of the first sentence: “Sculpture A exhibits degradation …”.

  • Or 'since being carved' where the pronoun is not involved. – Mitch Aug 10 '18 at 12:00
  • I have one more question actually. Why repeating the subject or pronoun is unnecessary when I say 'since being carved' there? – Jun Kyoto Aug 10 '18 at 12:28
  • 1
    Gerunds like “since being carved” / “since having been carved” pick up a nearby subject. In the current context, it wrongly picks up “the surrounding environment” as its subject, not “sculpture A” from the previous sentence. I wouldn’t use it here. – Daniel Harbour Aug 10 '18 at 13:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.