I'm having a debate with a colleague about whether a comma is needed in this phrase. I think it reads odd without a comma. From my understanding, 'further' is an adverb in this phrase, and 'faster' is an adjective. I know that adverbs can modify adjectives (in which case a comma would not be needed), but I think the meaning is lost if you don't have a comma in this phrase.

If anyone can clarify this for me, I'd appreciate it!

  • 1
    What do you intend to say? That you can further and faster, or that you can go further in a faster manner? – Davo Jul 24 '18 at 11:35
  • That you can go further in a faster manner. – Shiro Jul 24 '18 at 11:36
  • "Faster" is an adverb, too. – Kris Jul 24 '18 at 12:10
  • 1
    Without a comma, faster could modify further; with a comma, it would modify go. The better options would be: "Go further and faster" and "Go further, go faster". – Kris Jul 24 '18 at 12:12

It needs a comma.

The word with only affects the immediately former word. And so;

Go further faster with

infers that "further faster" is a normative term in some context. I doubt it is.

The phrase reads unnaturally; as if it should be a list of verbs. And is frustratingly vague without it being a sentence as with should also be attached with a proceeding word.

Go further, faster with stimulants?

In this case further and faster become questionably comparatively different. (Oh no! Did I miss a comma there? Or maybe the word "and") And that is my other point.

It would work without a comma only in absence of "with" if it were:

Go further faster

  • I have to disagree with at least your last point here. Looking at this phrase through the lens of advertising rhetoric, "GO FURTHER FASTER, WITH [the all-new Yugo/organized crime software/our employee underpayment strategy]" (whether faster is italicized or not), conveys more clearly what the author would want a reader to intuitively receive: 1. Concise statement to trigger an emotional engagement—in clever alliteration, comma (a new but related idea is coming next), 2. Insinuation that product X is the key to gratifying the triggered desire. – Jas. MacOisdealbha Jul 24 '18 at 18:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.