In class today the word 'friendliness' was split up into three morphemes rather than my prefered two.
I don't understand why 'li' has claim to be a morpheme rather than 'liness', which seems to be very productive.
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityIn class today the word 'friendliness' was split up into three morphemes rather than my prefered two.
I don't understand why 'li' has claim to be a morpheme rather than 'liness', which seems to be very productive.
ly is a morpheme that can be appended to most nouns to mean "like", so saintly means "like a saint". This turns the noun into an adjective.
ness is another morpheme that can be appended to an adjective, to create a noun describing that abstract property, e.g. "dark" => "darkness". When the adjective ends with y, it's usually changed to i, e.g. happiness (in general, we don't use the vowel form of "y" in the middle of words, and replace it with "i").
friendliness appends each of these morphemes separately: "friend" (noun) => "friendly" (adjective) => "friendliness" (abstract property noun)
It's common to use liness together, but that doesn't make it a single morpheme; the meaning of each morpheme doesn't change when they're combined this way.