1

In a sentence of this kind, in a programming environment:

This construct is "in a self explanatory manner" not interpretable, since it raises an ambiguity over the language´s syntax which is not determinable by the language itself.

"Obviously" would fit the case of a clear wrong syntax, but this one is not obvious (to (self) explain), although self explanatory (explained stating the (self) obvious).

Especially, I do want to judge the explanation as obvious, without judging the mistake as obvious.

As an analogy for the english language, how should I say:

The syntax "You I call" is "obviously" wrong since undetermined, however, the same syntax "Answers I need" is clearly interpretable, although "in a self explanatory manner" a wrong syntax, since the language by itself can not determine that Answers don´t need you.

Improve this question
5
  • Why is you I call wrong, let alone obviously wrong?
    – Jason Bassford
    Commented Jun 4, 2018 at 14:28
  • @JasonBassford I am afraid I am not fluent enough to really get this one, although I am glad you appreciated mine. (I had to think about it!)
    – lucchi
    Commented Jun 4, 2018 at 15:23
  • What I meant is I don't understand why the example given is wrong at all . . . However, I do have an alternative word I can provide despite that.
    – Jason Bassford
    Commented Jun 4, 2018 at 15:31
  • @JasonBassford The second sentence is just an intent to show the logic I want to express in a wider context, please let me know if it is misleading. My concern is the first sentence.
    – lucchi
    Commented Jun 4, 2018 at 16:19
  • X may not be taken for granted.
    – Lambie
    Commented Jun 4, 2018 at 16:43

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2

A word that can be used in place of obviously, and without a sense of "judgment," is demonstrably:

capable of being demonstrated
able to be proven or shown : possible to demonstrate APPARENT, EVIDENT

There is no demonstrable evidence that the treatment is effective.

Or:

The syntax "You I call" is "demonstrably" wrong . . .

Improve this answer
3
  • Without a sense of "judgment" is exactly why I don´t want "obviously" or "evident" (less cutting). Think about a simple (obvious) trapdoor, where seeing it is not obvious. I wouldn´t judge you for falling in the trap, but I can judge the trap as an obvious mechanism. Demonstrably would IMHO supose some kind of theorical reasoning to demonstrate that trapdoors open when you step on it, so you fall. In fact I do want to judge the explanation as obvious, without judging the mistake as obvious. Anyway I learned a new word today and I thank you for that.
    – lucchi
    Commented Jun 4, 2018 at 16:18
  • @lucchi If I hold up my hand, and I'm missing a finger, I demonstrably have only four fingers ... (I've demonstrated it by showing it to you.)
    – Jason Bassford
    Commented Jun 4, 2018 at 16:22
  • After reading comments, I must admit that, as long as I will actually give the explanation, I can let the reader judge the explanation for himself. The syntax is demonstrably undetermined: X, thus invalid. Thank you so much.
    – lucchi
    Commented Jun 4, 2018 at 17:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .