2

I remember there being a single word to represent currently accepted facts in a scientific discipline. Common knowledge, but in a scientific setting. It is a jargon-y sounding word.

You'd use it when mentioning an accepted theory or concept that may be unfamiliar to a reader, but is common enough that you don't need to prove or cite it yourself.

The case I'm trying to use it in is like this:

...important to note that this study is not on the existence of the bias as it is _______, but rather the failure of subjects to account for it...

I'd like to emphasize that I'm looking for a single word. I may be misremembering it, but I am pretty certain there is one word that fits this description.

  • This question is similar-ish, but is not a duplicate: english.stackexchange.com/questions/241904/… – kirkpatt May 23 '18 at 16:38
  • Is this query consistent with Thomas Kuhn's concept of a scientific paradigm? – DJohnson May 23 '18 at 16:39
  • ... as its existence is established ? – user184130 May 23 '18 at 17:01
  • ...established (citation needed!) fact .... Reviewer #2 will say... – loonquawl May 23 '18 at 17:09
5

Scientific consensus (from Wikipedia):

the collective judgment, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of study.

It also relates to Kuhn's paradigm shift which says that a single finding does not change the scientific consensus.

  • How would you word the sentence in the question using "scientific consensus?" – kirkpatt May 23 '18 at 18:11
  • 1
    @kirkpatt You could say: There is scientific consensus that the bias exists [add some references]. This study is not looking to prove the existence of the bias, but for situations when this bias does not hold up. More specifically, ...[add your hypotheses] – Boondoggle May 23 '18 at 19:02
4

I can’t think of a specifically scientific term, and although the suggestion of @Boondggle is not wrong, the use of the term “consensus” tends to irk me personally. A wording that I would prefer, although one can argue it really isn’t any better, is:

“it is generally accepted”

or more positively, and without the implication that scientific truth is determined by vote:

“it is well established”

generally citing a reference to a review of the topic, if possible.

So in the example given in the question I would write:

...important to note that this study is not on the existence of the bias — which is well establishedref — but rather the failure of subjects to account for it...

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.