I have always used both "root" as in route 66 and "rooter" as in the networking device. The latter has gotten me funny looks often, however I could not bring myself to accept the inconsistency. Today I heard "rowt" used for a path of movement by a radio presenter. Which is correct?
Route as in Route66 is pronounced root.
A Router puts packets on a route and so is pronounced the same as the road, ie rooter.
A rout is a disorderly retreat. And a router does the same to wood chips, so is pronounced rowter
In my local dialect (Toronto, Canada), it is root for a roadway, and rowt (but that's very approximate; see Canadian raising ) for the act of specifying a path (and rowter for the computer networking device)
In the UK, route is pronounced /ru:t/, rhyming with root. On the other hand, the pronunciation /raʊt/, rhyming with shout, is rout, meaning, among many other things, various kinds of gatherings of people (as a noun) and defeat (as a verb).
In my idiolect, a roadway is a "root," the communications device is a "rowter," and one "rowts" cables and things to where they need to go.
Seems like the pronunciation indicates whether you mean noun or verb.
It's a question of dialects. In the UK, it is pronounced as a homonym to root, as already been addressed. In America, it seems that those that pronounce it as a homonym to root are more concentrated on the east coast, as can be seen in a map (link below) visualizing the results of the Harvard Dialect Survey.
In a study of American dialects (link below), Stephanie Nicole Hedges finds that the probability to pronounce "route" as rhyming with "out" is 0.5 in New England, New York, and the Mid-Atlantic States, while it is 0.8 elsewhere in the USA.
Here in Virginia, route can be pronounced root or rowt, but a rowter is for computers, whereas rooter would refer only to your pig.
If you talking about a plant’s roots or the roots of your hair and so on, it should be the only time the “root” pronunciation is root is used.
That’s because if you say “root” for route, it just confuses things and doesn't make any sense to me. A router is a router, said as it’s spelled.
US Midwest: I pronounce the noun 'root' when it's used to name a road ("Route 66"). If I am asking what roads you will take to get to Chicago, however, I ask, "What 'rowt' will you be taking?" And I might respond to a similar question by saying "The Triple-A 'rowted' me through La Crosse."
And the box that controls your internet traffic is a 'rowter'.
So 'root' (rhymes with "hoot") is used only as a "proper noun", and 'rowt' is used everywhere else.
(I suspect that the special treatment of named roads with "root" is due in large part to the TV show "Route 66" (1960-64), and the earlier (1946) song by the same name. This pronunciation permeated US culture in the 50s and 60s.)
Today, the pronunciation of route as /raut/ (rhyming with out) is more prevalent in the USA.
But the two pronunciations are not equally distributed in the USA. In a study of American dialects, Stephanie Nicole Hedges found that the probability to pronounce route as rhyming with out is 0.5 in New England, New York, and the Mid-Atlantic States, while it is 0.8 elsewhere in the USA. This is reflected in the map from the Harvard Dialect Survey given in the answer by Holly Rayl.
If you consider other factors such as people living in urban or rural areas, age, sex, and education the distribution becomes even more complex: women, older people, people in urban areas, and people with higher education tend to prefer the pronunciation of route as /ru:t/ (rhyming with boot), while men, teenagers, people in rural areas, and people with lower education tend to prefer the pronunciation of route as /raut/ (rhyming with *out), at least in Canada.
This may correspond to the finding that in Britain the pronunciation of route as /raut/ (rhyming with out) is the one common among the British army.
Historically, the pronunciation with a diphthong has been recorded since the second half of the 18th century and was at that time the preferred pronunciation of some, but not all of the commentators. It has disappeared from standard British English in the course of the 19th century.
protected by Hugo May 5 '12 at 7:38
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?