2

Of the remaining three reveals, one was entirely tangential and inconsequential to the story, completely untelegraphed, happens around the 98% mark, and left me with a “Huh. Well… that’s nice, I suppose.” reaction.

from https://mattgemmell.com/review-origin-by-dan-brown/

closed as off-topic by Hot Licks, Edwin Ashworth, Bread, Janus Bahs Jacquet, Nigel J Apr 29 '18 at 15:06

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

I'd suggest untelegraphed here means that the subject reveal was not given away before the reveal. Merriam-Webster provides this definition of the transitive verb telegraph:"to make known by signs especially unknowingly and in advance." (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/telegraphed).

The phrase 98% mark indicates that the reveal happened 98% of the way through the story, perhaps.

0

The review is very condensed. 90% and 98% describe the position in the book as an alternative to page numbers.

'Untelegraphed' is related to the meaning [2] in Merriam-Webster, already cited. It is clear 'mattgemmell' is describing a fault in the writing from an author's point of view. In this case it is a failure to set the scene; a failure to create a believable setting for the reveal; and his failure to give any hints about this character/ happening. 'The third reveal,' cheats the reader. Dan Brown likes magic; but no-one would take him seriously if a boy wizard popped up, totally untelegraphed, and sorted everything. This reviewer thinks the reveal is the wrong sort of surprise.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.