This question already has an answer here:

Replacing the unknown quote marks with underscores, let’s say we’re trying to write this:

He responds, “Joe said ‘Mark said _I’m not coming._’”

One option is to alternate: He responds, “Joe said ‘Mark said “I’m not coming.”’”

Would it be crazy to use single or double angle quote marks? Like: He responds, “Joe said ‘Mark said ‹I’m not coming.›’”

I’m getting nowhere googling it.

Is there a better option?

I realize that, generally, the text will read better if it’s rephrased to nest less deeply. But I ask not as an author, but somebody formatting others’ work.

Edit: 91727, and the question it’s marked a duplicate of, are not duplicates of this question because they discuss two-deep embedded quotes, whereas this question assumes the solution to two-deep quotes (use single quotes) and asks about quotes three or more levels deep.

marked as duplicate by Edwin Ashworth, lbf, Bread, Nigel J, tchrist Apr 8 '18 at 14:36

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
    @EdwinAshworth Thanks for the link. Please see my edit. – twhb Apr 7 '18 at 9:42
  • Didn't you check the response mentioning nested quotes to 3 levels? You could also look up 'nested quotes' on the internet. – Edwin Ashworth Apr 7 '18 at 9:46
  • In any case, rules for three sets of quotation marks is unquestionably a duplicate. – Edwin Ashworth Apr 7 '18 at 9:49
  • 1
    @EdwinAshworth I can't seem to find that response on that page, but I agree, that last link is a duplicate. Thank you! Couldn't find it because it didn't have the tags I expected, maybe you could accept my edit adding them. – twhb Apr 7 '18 at 9:52
  • Yes; the only sane conclusion I can come up with is that the tag wasn't around in those days. // '...Usually, I would quote with doubles, and then singles within. But this is becoming a bit confusing and ugly too, when working with some translated literature in which it is very, very common for someone to quote someone, who then quotes another, and the chain goes on. Would I retain the principle of using double quotes initially when I quote the passage, and then keep using singles in the embeds/nests?' – Edwin Ashworth Apr 7 '18 at 11:45

I would use quote marks building up e.g. 'Joe said "Mark said '''I'm not coming."""

I'm not definitely sure if this is the proper way but it's how I have always done it since I was young and I've never been corrected on it.

By the way, if it was Joe telling you what Mark said, you would put: Joe said that Mark said that he wasn't coming.

This is as much as I can tell you.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.