I'm writing a critical review. I have written the following sentence. I would like to know if there is some significant problems. Especially I have a problem with the expression "stated to be a reason in order to". Could it be "stated as a reason"? Or some other way? And could it be "reason for"?

"Thus, while an objective, which in itself is legitimate, would has been stated to be a reason in order to override a right, the restriction may nevertheless be in fact motivated by hidden or unacceptable reasons, in which case the stated reason is just the pretext."


In the expression "stated to be a reason in order to" the "in order to" would refer not to the "reason", but to "stated to". In other words it would mean that something was stated as a reason for something entirely else in order to signify something. "As a reason for" would imply that an event happened and whatever preceded "as a reason for" was the reason for that event.

To put it in the context of your presented sentence, the legitimate objective was stated as reason so that someone can override a right. However if you write "..., was stated as a reason for overriding a right" you would imply that because of this legitimate objective a right has been overridden.

| improve this answer | |
  • Thank you for your answer. It is illustrative. Would "as a reason to override a right" work then? – Anton of Finland Apr 5 '18 at 6:37
  • Yes you could write that something was stated as a reason to override a right. – Vahagn Tumanyan Apr 5 '18 at 6:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.