How should the following phrase be written:

"Billy is quite confused, so rather than sleep, he ponders."

Would the verb sleep, always be in the plural form and never sleeps?


As Wayfaring Stranger suggested, the present participle would also work:

[1] Billy is quite confused, so rather than s̲l̲e̲e̲p̲i̲n̲g̲, he ponders.

The various functions of rather than

Rather than is a bit of a grammatical jack-of-all-trades, and it can function as quasi-coordinator [2a], a subordinator [2b], or a preposition [2c].

[2] a. He ponders rather than s̲l̲e̲e̲p̲s̲.
       b. He ponders, rather than s̲l̲e̲e̲p̲.
       c. He ponders, rather than s̲l̲e̲e̲p̲i̲n̲g̲.

It can be fronted when functioning as a subordinator or a preposition, but not when functioning as a quasi-coordinator. This is why one cannot have sleeps in the example given in the original question:

[3] a. *Rather than s̲l̲e̲e̲p̲s̲, he ponders. (not acceptable)
       b. Rather than s̲l̲e̲e̲p̲, he ponders.
       c. Rather than s̲l̲e̲e̲p̲i̲n̲g̲, he ponders.

The terminology and discussion above come from ComGEL 10.40; 12.69; 13.103; 14.15, 16, 19n; 15.52. Here are some relevant examples found in that source:

As a quasi-coordinator:

He is [to be pitied] rather than [to be disliked].

As a subordinator:

He paid the fine rather than [appeal to a higher court].
(bare infinitival clause)
Rather than [Robert drive in his present state], I'd prefer to drive him home myself.
(bare infinitival clause with a subject)

As a preposition:

Their actions precipitated the war rather than [averting it].

Bare infinitival vs. finite verb

As sumelic pointed out, in your example, one should not think of sleep as a finite verb in the plural, but rather as bare infinitival, a non-finite verb. Here 'bare' refers to the fact that we don't have a to as a part of the infinitival (i.e. it's just sleep rather than to sleep). To see that sleep is here indeed a bare infinitival rather than a finite verb in the plural, consider this example:

Rather than K̲i̲m̲ ̲g̲i̲v̲e̲ ̲t̲h̲e̲ ̲i̲n̲t̲r̲o̲d̲u̲c̲t̲o̲r̲y̲ ̲l̲e̲c̲t̲u̲r̲e̲, why don't you do it yourself? (CGEL, p. 1187)

If give were a finite verb here, it would have to be in the third person singular, gives. But it is not. What we have instead is a (somewhat rare) case of a bare infinitival clause with a subject. Distressingly (to some speakers), if the subject were a pronoun, it would almost certainly be in the accusative (e.g. me) rather than in the nominative (i.e. I): Rather than m̲e̲ give the introductory lecture, why don't you do it yourself? Many speakers are uncomfortable with this specter of a subject in the accusative, which normally belongs to the informal style, and so would often opt for a subjectless construction: Rather than h̲a̲v̲e̲ Kim give the introductory lecture, why don't you do it yourself?

| improve this answer | |
  • To me, 2b and 3a are in completely complementary distribution, both ungrammatical. “†He ponders rather than sleep” is utterly impossible to me (as is the variant noted in CGEL, p. 1317 n. 33: “†He rather ponders than sleep”). So I’d say it cannot be fronted as a quasi-coordinator, but must be fronted as a subordinator. This doesn’t go for non-finite clauses, though: “Rather than to be disliked, he is to be pitied” is fine. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Apr 2 '18 at 14:16
  • @janus-bahs-jacquet I'm not sure they are ungrammatical (though perhaps I'm wrong and you are right, and they are indeed ungrammatical). They are definitely less likely when unfronted, though. One indication they might be grammatical is from ComGEL 13.103. Here rather than and as well as are discussed on the same footing, and it is stated that ' they clearly have a prepositional or subordinating role, and have the mobility of adverbials, in that they can be placed in initial or final position.' – linguisticturn Apr 2 '18 at 14:32
  • The examples given there are the following two pairs: [3] a.*As well as printing the books, he publishes them.* b. He publishes the books, as well as printing them. [4] a. Rather than cause trouble, I'm going to forget the whole affair. b. I'm going to forget the whole affair, rather than cause trouble. One thing I notice is the presence of commas. I'm going to add them in [2b] and [2c]. – linguisticturn Apr 2 '18 at 14:32
  • @JanusBahsJacquet I wonder whether there isn't some elision going on in some people's minds: He would rather ponder than sleep. – tchrist Apr 2 '18 at 14:35
  • @tchrist Both CGEL and ComGEL say that would rather (or 'd rather) is a 'modal idiom'. For example, in ComGEL 15.52 we have: 'Clauses of preference are mainly introduced by the subordinators rather than and sooner than, with the bare infinitive as the verb of the clause: [1] Rather than go there by air, I'd take the slowest train. ['I'd prefer to take the slowest train.'] ... The combination 'd rather [= would rather or had rather] is a modal idiom. Corresponding to [1] is [1a]: [1a] I'd rather take the slowest train than go there by air. – linguisticturn Apr 2 '18 at 14:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.