0

One of my colleague keeps using "integrate against" as in the following sentence:

The component A is integrated against the platform B.

Google search shows several hundreds of the form. As far as I know, however, "integrate" is typically used along with the preposition "with" or "into".

Could someone guide me on what is the correct usage? If "against" can be used, in what context is it proper?

Thank you.

| improve this question | |
  • 2
    You could ask your colleague where they picked up the usage. I can't finfd many examples outside the maths domain. – Edwin Ashworth Mar 26 '18 at 10:14
  • 1
    Is it supposed to mean that component A is integrated into platform B? – Jim Mar 29 '18 at 1:35
  • 2
    "Against" is valid in some uses in mathematics and related domains, but the term "integrate" there has a different meaning from the non-math term. – Hot Licks Mar 29 '18 at 1:36
  • @Jim yes, it is. – Felipe1979 Mar 29 '18 at 8:00
  • 1
    @Felipe1979 - There probably are a handful of non-math contexts where "against" could be deemed appropriate, but they are rare. – Hot Licks Apr 4 '18 at 12:04
1

In mathematics, to integrate A against B means to perform the computation ∫ A dB or, occasionally, ∫ A B. In the usual English sense of the word integrate meaning to combine objects A and B, however, it is exclusively used with the prepositions with and into (see here, for example). I think your colleague has heard integrate against in the mathematical usage and has mistakenly assumed it to share the usual English meaning.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.