0

I have the two sentences:

If you can't beat them, join them. Once your opponents realize they have no chance of defeating you, they'll join you.

I feel theres a word missing that could link those two sentences to the transition into the second sentence make sense.

I am thinking of maybe adding the word

hence,

so it becomes

If you can't beat them, join them. Hence, once your opponents realize they have no chance of defeating you, they'll join you.

But I feel there is an issue somewhere.

| improve this question | |
  • 1
    The two statements are actually contradictory and do not belong together. In the first you join them because you cannot beat them. In the second, they join you because they have no chance of defeating you. It doesn't make sense. – Nigel J Mar 8 '18 at 14:04
  • 2
    @NigelJ It seems to make sense to me. The first sentence restates the proverb; in the second, the opponents apply the proverb more or less verbatim. – Watercleave Mar 9 '18 at 3:36
  • How could one rephrase this by not offending the opponent since your end goal is to have them join your side. – John Mar 9 '18 at 13:15
1

There is nothing grammatically wrong with how you've written it, but it is a garden path paragraph. The first sentence implies that that speaker is speaking to someone who is losing, the second sentence implies that the speaker is speaking to someone who is winning.

The first change I'd make would be to make it clear that the first sentence is a restating of a proverb, i.e. a quote. I'd do this by putting quote marks around it.

"If you can't beat them, join them." Once your opponents realize they have no chance of defeating you, they'll join you.

The second thing that's needed is some context. In the middle of a conversation where it's clear that a) the person is winning and b) the person wants the opposition to join them, then my text above makes perfect sense:

Abigail: I wish XYZ Corporation would stop competing with us, and instead accept my generous offer to buy them out and merge our businesses!

Stuart: "If you can't beat them, join them." Once your opponents realize they have no chance of defeating you, they'll join you.

On the other hand, if you are intending this to be a stand-alone phrase, a new version of the proverb maybe, then you need to add the context in within the phrase:

"If you can't beat them, join them." Once your opponents realize this, and realize they have no chance of defeating you, they'll join you.

or

"If you can't beat them, join them." Everyone knows that. So once your opponents realize they have no chance of defeating you, they'll join you.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.