Can someone please help me understand the second part of this sentence, more specifically the part that relates to 'industrial dominance'.
Here is the sentence:
Through a comparative analysis of star texts and autobiographical narratives published in magazines and papers, I also complicate what may suggest a model of industrial dominance over passive female subjects.
To help you better understand the context, the sentence that comes after this one is:
Drawing on Nan Enstad’s research on early twentieth-century, working-class, movie-loving girls, I argue that, contrary to what the press advertised, girl fans’ screen aspirations did not derive from idle romanticism but rather from a sober quest for personal and professional advancement.
Thank you for your answers.