English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
While I was reading a book, I stumbled upon a sentence "I remember the advice he gave to me".
From my understanding, give can be used in two ways.
First. Give + IO + DO. For example, "He gave me an answer."
Second. Give + DO + to IO. For example, "He gave a book to Jane."
So, I thought the correct sentence should be "I remember the advice he gave me" But the sentence includes preposition "to". Which one is right? And why is it?
Sometimes the 'to' is necessary to avoid confusion. Bad example: "He gave her it." Was she given to it, or was it given to her? "He gave it to her" is clear. In the imperative, we would not say, "Give me it." "Give it to me, please" is better. I see both "I remember the advice he gave me" and "I remember the advice he gave to me" as perfectly acceptable. I would likely use the former if that was the end of the sentence, but I would probably use the latter if there were more to say: "I remember the advice he gave to me many years ago" or "...to me when I was your age."
Both uses are correct. In fact, you already answered your own question. You're right, there are two ways of using give in this context. You can either give somebody something, which is your the first use you listed, or give something to somebody, which is the second one. The sentence you saw is using the second way, and you're using the first one. So technically both the sentences are correct. Compare these:
He gave me an advice
And
He gave an advice to me
They're both using a correct usage of the verb "give"
Also, always check a dictionary for different uses of verbs and their prepositions
English is an interesting language in that we have one noun case (I'd call it the Dative, on the basis of Latin cases) where we need to unless we invert word order.
This Dative case is when something is to/for someone (when a noun is an indirect object). He spoke to me; He waited for me. This case always uses a preposition with intransitive verbs (verbs that don't admit a direct object), like the ones above. However, with verbs like 'wrote', you can have a direct object like 'it' or 'that', or noun like 'a book'/'a letter'. When we have a Dative with a transitive, you can say either 'He wrote a letter to me' or 'He wrote me a letter' (inverting the word order to get rid of the preposition).
These phrases are perfectly understandable because 'me' doesn't make sense as the object of write. Grammatically, 'me' on its own is the right case, but semantically, it doesn't make sense - how could someone write you?Because of this, the meaning is perfectly understandable.
When you have a phrase like he gave her it, because there is no preposition 'to', a reader assumes the inverted word order and therefore takes it as the thing being given and her as the person receiving it.
Because 'gave' is transitive, in a sentence like 'he gave her it', inversion makes perfect sense. However, if you don't have an object (it), inversion doesn't work - he gave to her cannot become he gave her as a standalone sentence. However, in a compound sentence of multiple clauses, your object might be stated earlier, which allows for omission: "the advice he gave me was good" makes sense because 'the advice' is introduced as the subject of the sentence, and 'he gave me' modifies it as if it were the direct object of 'gave'. Thus the word order is inverted, 'to' is omitted, and finally the direct object 'the advice' is omitted because it is already implied.
To answer your question, "I remember the advice he gave to me" is correct, and "I remember the advice he gave me" is also correct.
The writer has used “gave to” instead of “gave” because it suits the rhythm they have imagined for the sentence being spoken aloud.
There is an aspect of language called prosody that deals with rhythm and similar issues. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosody_(linguistics)
Rhythm is like grammar, in that it sets up expectations in the mind of the listener (or reader). The writer can conform to those expectations, and use the beat to emphasize certain words, or they can break the expectations to create a different kind of effect.
In this specific situation, “gave to me” ends with a slightly different beat than “gave me”. Not knowing the sentence that follows, I can only speculate here. However, the most likely explanation is that reading the two sentences together will cause the rhythmic emphasis to fall on the words that the writer wants to emphasize.
If you google “rhythm in speech”, you will find a whole world of information, including this charming youtube video by English Jade, Go from BORING to INTERESTING with English rhythm. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8XVeMLYiNM0#menu
