Possible Duplicate:
Shorter way to say “conversational partner”

What's a good word for something or someone who is holding a conversation? Or perhaps a bit broader, someone who knows how to hold a conversation with someone or something.

Need a name for something or someone who knows how to hold a conversation with something or someone.

Was thinking Conversationist, but that doesn't seem to be a word :p


One who is good at making conversation is a conversationalist.

  • I agree that conversationalist is probably the right answer (I think OP's phrase "knows how to" implies that the person is good at making conversation). You could also call such a person a good communicator, though the meaning is broader.
    – user13141
    Sep 23 '11 at 16:08
  • 2
    a sparkling conversationalist, if you don't mind a cliché
    – JeffSahol
    Sep 23 '11 at 17:05
  • Ah, so I wasn't too far off then. Was just missing an 'al'. Think I'll go for this!
    – Svish
    Sep 24 '11 at 7:23

The standard term is interlocutor, but if the word conversation (or an equivalent) is already in the context, people often prefer the less "wordy" term participant.

As @Simchona says, there is also conversationalist, but ordinarily this specifically means someone who is habitually good at keeping up the flow of conversation, so that other participants feel interested/relaxed/motivated and will thus also actively participate. It doesn't normally mean someone who talks a lot it such a way that others listen without saying much themselves, nor does it mean someone who happens to be in a conversation right now.

  • Think I'll go with conversationalist, as it in my context it isn't necessarily in a conversation right now. Knows how to and could be. Also, I don't think anyone would understand what I was talking about if I used the word interlocutor :D
    – Svish
    Sep 24 '11 at 7:25
  • @Svish: There's no doubt conversationalist is the right word for one who's good at it, but interlocutor isn't exactly rare. In fact it's become the more common word over recent decades, so I wouldn't worry about people not understanding. Sep 24 '11 at 11:35

A neutral word would be converser, though it's not too common.


I have seen conversant used for this kind of thing.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.