A graph, a chart, and a plot can all refer to the same thing. Is there any even somewhat consistent distinction in these three words?

(I mean, in this particular sense of the words; it is not relevant that a chart is also a nautical map, a plot is also a scheme, and a graph is also an unrelated mathematical object.)

  • If you're happy to say they can all refer to the same thing, surely it doesn't make sense to ask us to tell you why you're mistaken. You presumably learnt to accept these words as potential synonyms by noticing how they are used, so it should be obvious there can't possibly be a reliable distinction. If there is a potential distinction, people ignore it anyway, so it wouldn't be reliable. Commented Sep 23, 2011 at 12:35
  • 9
    @FumbleFingers that takes the prize for "Most Barely Comprehensible Rant". Thus far.
    – JeffSahol
    Commented Sep 23, 2011 at 13:05
  • 2
    Notwithstanding my comment above, I didn't vote to close. It's true each term can be looked up individually, but dictionaries are not usually good at explaining the subtleties of distinction between overlapping meanings such as this. Commented Sep 23, 2011 at 13:12
  • @Jeff: It wasn't intended as a rant. I think the question is perfectly okay apart from the fact that OP asks for a reliable distinction. Clearly this is a case where there is overlap, as Guffa's excellent answer points out. Commented Sep 23, 2011 at 13:14
  • 1
    The thing that really throws a great big monkey wrench into this is that "graph" also has a mathematical meaning of a structure used to model pairwise relations between objects using nodes connected by edges. In this context, a tree is a kind of graph, so the tree in an Org Chart is actually a(n) (acyclical) graph.
    – Michael
    Commented Apr 12, 2018 at 17:59

6 Answers 6


The terms partly overlap, at least if they are used somewhat loosely, and in that overlap there isn't really any difference.

A graph is a diagram of a mathematical function, but can also be used (loosely) about a diagram of statistical data.

A chart is a graphic representation of data, where a line chart is one form.

A plot is the result of plotting statistics as a diagram in different ways, where some of the ways are similar to some chart types.

So, a line chart could be called a graph or a plot, while a pie chart is neither a graph nor a plot. A scatterplot is a chart but not (strictly) a graph, but the purpose of a scatterplot is to determine if there is some relation that can be expressed as a function that then naturally can be drawn as a graph.

  • 7
    Perhaps some enterprising soul here on EL&U might care to make a Venn diagram of these three words, with each word represented by a circle with diameter proportional to its relative frequency of use in the context of diagrams. It might be interesting to debate where the circles overlap, and what kind of diagrams fall into each overlapping area. Specifically, the position of that chart itself! :) Commented Sep 23, 2011 at 13:08
  • 2
    "Pie graph" is a common term in AusEng at least. Google confirms lots of results... Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 13:29
  • 4
    @curiousdannii: You can call a pie chart a pie graph, but it's still not a graph, it's a chart.
    – Guffa
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 13:43
  • 2
    @Guffa Who says? Words mean what people mean by using them. Maybe in the past they were more distinct, and maybe in some varieties of English they still are, but in AusEng now they're essentially synonymous. Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 13:53
  • 2
    @curiousdannii: Using a word in an expression doesn't change the meaning of the word itself. Using pie graph doesn't change then meaning of graph, just like using horse shoe doesn't change the meaning of shoe.
    – Guffa
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 14:02

Chart and graph are essentially synonymous, but there are some cases where one is preferred over another. This Google Ngram "chart" shows their relative uses:

An Ngram chart showing the relative occurrences of pie chart,pie graph,bar chart,bar graph,line chart,line graph

From this we can see that "bar chart" and "bar graph" are used about as much as each other (and have been since the early twentieth century). "Line graph" is strongly preferred over "line chart", and "pie chart" is strongly preferred over "pie graph" (though in my own AusEng I think "pie graph" feels more natural.)

Plots are different. We make plots out of points, and for something to be a plot, both axes must be continuous. For example, you can make a plot of the height vs. weight of a population, but not the height vs. species, because species are discrete; you can't plot a point halfway between a cow and a chicken. So I'd say that plots are a subset of charts/graphs.

A scatter plot of height vs. weight
(source: ablongman.com)

  • Thanks! While I find your answer plausible, would you happen to have any sources for the claim that “plot” is about points in particular?
    – Kevin Reid
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 14:35
  • @Kevin, no just native speaker intuition. I might be able to find something tomorrow. Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 14:38
  • 1
    Quite late to this party, but wouldn't a boxplot defy the two continuous axes rule?
    – Minnow
    Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 17:04
  • @Minnow true, but that's not a normal plot. Derived words usually have a shift in meaning. Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 21:40
  • There seem to be a number of plots listed on wikipedia that do not have only continuous variables. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plot_(graphics)
    – jamie
    Commented Aug 15, 2017 at 19:32

In my professional and academic writing experience, I have never encountered a style guide that defines rules for these words.

I am Australian, an engineer (former) and a mathematics teacher and I consider the following to be best practice when writing and teaching.

  • graph – when a line is drawn (of a function/formula or of continuous data).
  • chart – when other shapes and symbols (e.g. bars) are used to represent data.
  • plot – when points are marked on a coordinate system.


  • bar chart
  • pie chart
  • line graph
  • scatter plot

I “teach” this but wouldn’t enforce it.

The etymology of the suffix -graph supports my practice. Scratching with a stick produces a line. But could also produce a pictograph, figure, diagram etc.

The etymology of both chart might support my practice, in that it is derived from words meaning “map”. A map is a pictorial or symbolic representation.

The etymology of plot might support my practice. Areas of land are typically divided into square or rectangular “plots”. Rectangular areas correlate with the notion of coordinates (sides of a rectangle). Furthermore, variations of plot in other languages typically mean marking points on a chart.

Other supportive uses…

  • A seismograph graphs continuous earthquake data.
  • A navigator plots a course on a nautical chart/map using a parallel plotter.
  • A phonograph produces sound when a needle (stylus) traces over the continuous etch on the cylinder.

The word photograph seems to deviate, unless you imagine that it’s a new way to “draw” with light, the old way being with a pencil on paper.

  • 1
    I think that the first half of the above is sensible, useful and will not lead to much confusion below university level. A complication is that the definition of graph in advanced mathematics is much broader: 'In mathematics, and more specifically in graph theory, a graph is a structure amounting to a set of objects in which some pairs of the objects are in some sense "related." ' {Wikipedia}. And a problem with what follows is that arguing from etymology as opposed to from accepted modern usage is the 'etymological fallacy'. Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 13:02
  • 2
    @EdwinAshworth As far as I know, there is no usage of “graph” which includes both graph-theoretical graphs and “graphs of a function”.
    – Kevin Reid
    Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 16:20
  • 2
    @EdwinAshworth I'm the OP and I disagree with you.
    – Kevin Reid
    Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 16:54
  • 1
    @KevinReid it's interesting to get a new answer to a 5-year-old question, isn't it? :-)
    – Hellion
    Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 16:58
  • 2
    Like this answer. Very simple to understand. Commented Jan 4, 2018 at 15:41

Here's a quote from a book called "Basic Allied Health Statistics and Analysis"

A chart illustrates data using only one quantitative coordinate. Charts are most appropriate for quantitatively comparing discrete categories or groups of data. The most common charts are column, bar, line and pie charts. [...] A bar chart is particularly useful for displaying data such as gender, ethnicity, occupation, types of discharges, and treatment categories. Bar charts are appropriate for displaying categorical data. Bar charts compare categories or groups using some quantitative measurement.

A graph is a method of relating one qualitative [I think this a mistake, and it's meant to say 'quantitative'...] variable to another quantitative variable, usually time. The most common graphs are histograms and frequency polygons. [...] Quantitative continuous data are displayed via a graph. The two most commonly employed graphs are the histogram and the frequency polygon.

So it seems charts are for when there's one qualitative variable (such as type, preference, or gender) and one quantitative variable (such as time, age or amount). These include pie charts and bar charts. Whereas graphs are for when you have two quantitative variables.

  • Which country ?
    – Pacerier
    Commented Jul 6, 2017 at 6:27
  • The book was published and printed in the USA
    – Paul Jones
    Commented Jul 6, 2017 at 10:08

Chart and graph are not synonymous.

Consider an Eye testing Chart for example - there is no graph on that.

Consider a Pie Chart - there is no graph on that either.

Consider a Look-Up Chart - there is no graph on that.

Consider a Heat Map - that is also a type of Chart.

A graph can be ON a chart though, hence a bar graph can be a line chart.

  • 'Chart' and 'graph' are synonymous. Check the standard definition elsewhere on ELU: 'synonymous' does not mean 'interchangeable with little or no change in meaning in all usages'. Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 12:53
  • @EdwinAshworth: I would not agree with your definition of synonym. Synonyms are interchangeable; the degree to which they are interchangeable determines how synonymous they are (could be weakly or strongly). I would say weak synonyms are not deserving of the name. Perfect, however, they do not need to be. Commented Sep 30, 2020 at 12:53
  • @Cerberus_Reinstate_Monica Definition of synonym? I didn't give one. Commented Sep 30, 2020 at 13:46
  • @EdwinAshworth: You have given enough information about your definition. Commented Sep 30, 2020 at 15:35
  • @Cerberus 'Inform' and 'lie' are not 'interchangeable with little or no change in meaning in all usages'. That doesn't make them synonyms. // 'Synonyms are [on occasion] interchangeable; the degree to which they are interchangeable determines how synonymous they are (could be weakly or strongly), I would say weak synonyms are not deserving of the name' posits two classes of synonyms. This is a ludicrous model. And you posit weak synonyms then say the term is meaningless. Commented Sep 30, 2020 at 19:13

A plot would apply to line charts, with plotted points. A chart could arrange the data in columns, rows, pie shapes, etc., and plots. Graphs are synonymous with charts, though i would reserve "chart" for more plain depictions and call data arranged in columns of kittens "graphs" (though that's just my style choice).

  • 3
    I'm intrigued. What are columns of kittens? Commented Sep 23, 2011 at 12:56
  • 1
    @FumbleFingers my guess is that it would be something you would find at graphjam.memebase.com
    – JeffSahol
    Commented Sep 23, 2011 at 13:03
  • @Jeff: I did a search for "kittens" there, but it didn't have any. Are you thinking of those spam emails that say "Send me money, or I'll drown a kitten?". Which presumably could have an attached chart showing how many kittens the spammer has drowned recently because people failed to cough up. Commented Sep 23, 2011 at 13:19
  • 2
    @FumbleFingers No, I was just guessing about that site. But a quick google search did turn up this gem: xkcd.com/231
    – JeffSahol
    Commented Sep 23, 2011 at 13:26

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.