1

Shall I use "have" or "had" in this sentence:

These lights flickered continuously like traffic lights which had/have gone mad.

  • 2
    << 'Elbonium Emporium' used to sell cheap desk-lamps. These lights flickered continuously like traffic lights which had/have gone mad. >> But << There were lights all along the embankment. These lights flickered continuously like traffic lights which had gone mad. >> Property of the lights vs specific lighting situation. – Edwin Ashworth Jan 20 '18 at 0:29
0

'Had' is the past tense of 'have'. Both are used within verb phrases to create the 'Perfect', or complete, tense. 'Have gone mad' means, at this moment, the action of going mad has been completed. 'Had gone mad' means the action of going mad was completed at some time in the past. I think either tense is valid in the expression 'like traffic lights ...' Native speakers usually use the most simple tense with more than one valid option, so I expect more would choose the present tense, 'have', than the past tense, 'had'.

| improve this answer | |
0

"Had" is required by the sequence of tenses, but you don't actually need it. "Like traffic lights gone mad" would be better style.

| improve this answer | |

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.