0

Is it w or wn?I have no idea,kindly help me out? What about in words like rogue,does ue or u count as silent consonants although they are clearly vowels?

closed as unclear what you're asking by Mick, Skooba, Scott, Drew, Nigel J Jan 9 '18 at 2:13

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    They're silent letters. But their presence does change the way the word is pronounced. I don't think that makes them consonants, though. Do you have a reference that claims it does? – Lawrence Jan 8 '18 at 16:16
  • No I don't, was just wondering. – user466377 Jan 8 '18 at 16:18
  • BTW what's your opinion on lawn and dawn, what are the silent letters in those – user466377 Jan 8 '18 at 16:19
  • 1
    I don't think there are any; they're just -aw- sounds. I'm not a linguist, though. – Lawrence Jan 8 '18 at 16:25
  • Have you researched the etymology of these words? Dawn comes from dauen (c. 1200) – Mick Jan 8 '18 at 16:27
4

Please read this.

Technically speaking, there are no "silent letters" in English words. That's because our letters do not represent pronunciations the way you think they do.

Specifically, there are no “silent” letters in dawn /dɔn/ or lawn /lɔn/: the ‹aw› digraph represents the phoneme /ɔ/ there, just as it does in law. After all, lawn is pronounced just like law with an extra /n/.

We call this /ɔ/ phoneme the THOUGHT vowel, and it like all sounds in English has many, many, many possible spellings, and ‹ough› is one of those.

There are no silent letters in thought either, just a digraph followed by a tetragraph followed at long last by a monograph to create /θɔt/.

A better question would be to ask about gone /gɔn/, since that one cannot be explained by the LOT–CLOTH split, in that it does not have a voiceless fricative after it like off, moth, and boss all do.

But that you didn’t ask. :)

In the case of rogue, /rog/, the ‹gue› at the end is a trigraph that here represents the phoneme /g/. Other examples include analogue, dialogue, epilogue, fatigue, intrigue, league, plague, vague.

As with all mappings between graphemic sequences and phonemic sequences in English, which are inherently many-to-many, there are many other words where that same graphemic sequence produces a different set of phonemes, let alone phones. Examples where ‹gue› is not a trigraph and does not represent /g/ include tongue, argue, ague, segue.

As soon as you start talking about “silent letters” in English, you’ve given tacit approval to a model that doesn’t apply to English, so it’s difficult to provide a “correct” answer to a question that is inherently misleading.

I again request that you please read this.

  • 1
    What about the 'p' in pneumonia - isn't that a silent letter? – Lawrence Jan 8 '18 at 17:06
  • @Lawrence It's a digraph from Greek representing the /n/ phoneme. There are no silent letters, just many-to-many mappings between sequences of graphemes and sequences of phones. – tchrist Jan 8 '18 at 17:17
  • Hm, fair enough. – Lawrence Jan 8 '18 at 17:20
  • I'm surprised you didn't mention the cot-caught merger. – KarlG Jan 8 '18 at 17:24
  • @KarlG That's because COT-CAUGHT doesn't predict how those words will be pronounced, but LOT-CLOTH does. There are speakers for whom gone and lawn do not rhyme. – tchrist Jan 8 '18 at 17:53

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.