Is using a comma after 'or rather' necessary? The sentence would be: "So begins the most intriguingly opening book I’ve ever read. Or rather, the only book that was gripping from the very start."

  • 1
    It's not grammatically necessary, but the sentences with and without the comma mean different things. – Lawrence Dec 9 '17 at 23:11
  • It also disambiguates the case of a comma after the or, which has yet another shade of meaning. FWIW, I think you probably want "intriguing book opening". And even that's very informal. – Phil Sweet Dec 10 '17 at 1:23

I can't provide a simple comment because my account is new, but hopefully this response will be worthy of its own answer.

No comma after rather definitely adds an informal layer to the sentence, which is also quiet harsh. Read in this way, it would seem like you were insulting all of the other books you've read, which have not been gripping from the start. It sounds more direct and forceful without the comma.

Context is everything. Knowing this, gauge what kind of message you want to convey.


Yes, it's necessary. You're creating a pause in the structure of the sentence, and in doing so (in this case), adding drama or drawing attention to what next follows.

As an aside, you may need to reword the first sentence to something like, "So begins the most intriguing opening to a book I’ve ever read." or, ...the most intriguingly open start to a book... or, ...the most openly intriguing book... depending on the direction you're taking.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.