I saw this headline today, "Neil Young to open up entire online music archive for free".

Is that sentence correct, and if so, could it have multiple meanings?

In this instance it's clear to me what it means, but couldn't it be misunderstood in other examples?

To me it could maybe be confused as him commenting on opening up his music archive for free.

closed as off-topic by Dan Bron, Hot Licks, Edwin Ashworth, Nigel J, NVZ Nov 18 '17 at 10:33

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Dan Bron, Edwin Ashworth, Nigel J, NVZ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    For the record, that isn't a sentence in the normal sense of that term, where there's a subject governing a finite verb. Here the subject is governing a non-finite verb, specifically one in the infinitive. – tchrist Nov 17 '17 at 14:50
  • I don't see any ambiguity here: could you explain how it might be misunderstood? – Andrew Leach Nov 17 '17 at 15:22
  • It is a headline. Not a sentence. If you think other examples may be misunderstood, why not give us such an example? – GEdgar Nov 17 '17 at 15:25
  • Well, it's kinda the "to" that i find odd. Another example could be if there stood: "Peter Petersen to open up the Shibu Resturant." I wouldn't know if that was an interview with a guy, talking about having opened up a resturant with that name. Or if he is about to do so. – Myno Nov 17 '17 at 15:48
  • @Myno Again, this is commonplace headlinese; to X means will X (as a shortening of is to X) for brevity. See past questions tagged as headline-english or this Andy Bodle column if you are unfamiliar with the concept. – choster Nov 17 '17 at 21:58

headlines do not follow the same grammatical structure as a proper sentence. most editors use the guidelines in the Chicago Book of Rules. as a complete sentence, it is incomplete. as a headline, it is correct. sentence structure has devolved due to texting so many people communicate in phrases rather than full sentences. any true sentence can be conjugated. that is how you know. conjugate the words to see if they fit the grammatical rule. i see online translators. i wonder if they have online conjugators? as it things aren't screwed up enough...haha... hope that helps.

  • Do you have something against the rule of capitalising the first letter of a sentence ? – Nigel J Nov 17 '17 at 23:50
  • 1
    I'm struggling with the implication that the structure of newspaper headlines is somehow caused by the advent of texting. – KernelPanic Nov 18 '17 at 10:00

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.