1

So I am a mathematician, and I am trying to explain the consequence of an equation from " the physiscs points of view". Is it okay to state it in this manner: "from the physics point of view " ?

  • From the physicist's point of view. – Wottensprels Oct 15 '17 at 9:41
  • 4
    @Sprottenwels Ok, but I don't see much wrong with "from the physics point of view" either. The word "physics" is simply being used as a noun modifier. It is perfectly idiomatic. – WS2 Oct 15 '17 at 9:58
  • @WS2 I'm not a native speaker. I thought it sounded odd. – Wottensprels Oct 15 '17 at 10:01
  • I don't think either is going to sound convincing. Equations don't have consequences: the laws they model (or attempt to), or more precisely, the obeying of such laws, do / does. A transferred usage (cf 'I'll boil a kettle') is, in my opinion, too imprecise in a scientific article. A little more context is required. Note that Nigel J's answer avoids the mention of equations. – Edwin Ashworth Oct 15 '17 at 10:58
3

'From a physics point of view, what is happening when a device overheats ?' is the title of a paper written by Rob van den Berg, Master Student in Theoretical Physics. So it would seem to be an acceptable phrase if a physicist uses it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.