0

I'm writing an essay on Intellectual Property Rights in the Digital Age, and I have the following sentence:

DRM is an instrument to protect Copyright, and therefore it should be implemented in such way that it respects the rights of users and [X] alike.

Here, [X] should be a word for the copyright holder that juxtaposes with the word "users". Currently I have "copyright holders", and previously I had "creators". None of them satisfy me because I feel like a composite term damages the juxtaposition effect, and because the creator and the copyright holder may be different people.

What would be an appropriate word?

  • 5
    Perhaps "owners". – Xanne Oct 5 '17 at 2:58
  • 1
    Use "copyright holder" or "owner" and don't let worry about how the sentence sounds get in the way of clear communication :-) – DanielSank Oct 5 '17 at 3:59
2

"Owner" is the right word; copyrights are property, and that property, in whole or in part, can be transferred. As you note in a comment, the current owner may not be the creator. The copyright, or some of the rights it confers, may have been transferred; or the copyrighted material may have been created as a work for hire.

"Holder" is also acceptable.

See bitlaw on copyright for more information.

0

It sounds like you're referring to, in your context, those who have created whatever intellectual property: the authors of the copyrights.

  • I point out in my question that the creator/author of a work is not necessarily the copyright holder of said work, which is why something such as "author" is ill-suited. – Bernardo Meurer Oct 5 '17 at 4:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.