0

Today, foreign names are anglicized more or less systematically from their original spelling: the Russian surname "Петров" generally becomes "Petrov", not the calqued "Peterson" or the more phonetic "Petrof" or "Petroff" (which reflect final-obstruent devoicing). The phonetic type of surname anglicization was apparently in style at least as recently as the early 1900s, when Rachmaninoff (Рахманинов) started coming to the United States.

Insofar as writers sought to anglicize -в surnames by their sound, what norms and influences guided the choice between -ff and -f? Was -ff influenced by German or French orthography? Does -f "look wrong" to some readers? Is the -ff supposedly a longer sound, and if so, why would one be called for? Was either spelling ever more canonical?

  • Except for of, the only English words ending with of end with oof (like proof, roof, hoof) and have a different vowel than Rachmaninoff and Pavlov. So maybe the double f was chosen by analogy with English words like off and doff. – Peter Shor Oct 6 '17 at 13:08
  • Great point @PeterShor. in that light, the -of ("Baranof") seems like the outlier. – Aaron Brick Oct 6 '17 at 16:05
  • A relevant Russian SE question: Sergei Rachmaninov or Rachmaninoff – sumelic Oct 8 '17 at 1:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.