0

"I recommend trying it if you like writing with pen and paper". This is a sentence in a book. Why isn't there an "a" article before "pen" since pen is a countable noun? Is it just a style preference?

marked as duplicate by FumbleFingers, Edwin Ashworth, Mari-Lou A, Laurel, 1006a Sep 10 '17 at 21:19

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
    Article use is always tricky when an idiom is involved. A Google search for "with pen and paper" shows that this would seem an acceptable choice, though adding an 'a' is by no means wrong (and seems the more common choice here). I'd not normally include the article here. – Edwin Ashworth Sep 9 '17 at 14:49
6

This is an anwer that I posted on this similar question here:

Omission of the indefinite article to eliminate ambiguity


Bare Coordination

This phenomenon is one that is not at all well understood, and also one which is currently the subject of much academic research. It is an example of Bare Coordination. This is when coordinated noun phrases (NPs) which we would otherwise expect to take a determiner of some description appear "bare" with no determiner or article at all. By coordinated, we mean that they appear in phrases using the coordinators and, or, but and so forth (some people call coordinators coordinating conjunctions). The reason that they seem to be able to appear like this is because they are in such coordinations.

Here are some more examples:

  • A black cat and a brown dog were fighting in the street. Cat and dog were equally filthy.
  • Are you man or mouse?
  • I had pen and paper ready to make notes.
  • Mother and child were said to be recovering well.
  • He appeared to be millionaire and homeless vagabond at the same time.
  • Nothing is so sacred as love between husband and wife.

Bare Coordination versus Bare Role NPs

Notice that these aren't bare role NP's which specify a unique role. Bare role NPs can occur freely as Predicative Complements without a determiner. The nouns in these coordinations cannot appear bare when not in a coordination:

Bare role NP

  • He was Managing Director at Boots.
  • Who's going to be Best Man?
  • We elected her treasurer.

Nouns from the Bare Coordinations

  • *He was millionaire. (ungrammatical)
  • *He used to be cat. (ungrammatical)
  • *Are you mouse? (ungrammatical)
  • *She was wife. (ungrammatical)

Notice as well that bare role NP's can only function as Predicative Complements. However, bare co-ordinations can appear freely in Subject or Object function:

Bare Coordination:

  • Father and son came to see me. (Subject)
  • We punished licensee and client together for the misdemeanour. (Direct Object)

Bare Role NP

  • *Chief executive was an arse. (Subject, ungrammatical)
  • *I punched Managing Director. (Object, ungrammatical)

Definiteness

Notice as well from the first group of examples, that it makes no difference whether the noun phrases are semantically definite or indefinite. In man or mouse both man and mouse are generic and don't refer to a or the man, or the mouse. In contrast, in Both husband and wife are recovering well, the husband and the wife are very specific, definite people. The fact that a noun phrase is in a bare coordination construction doesn't seem to depend on whether they are semantically definite or indefinite. Nobody knows why these bare noun phrases can occur in these coordinations. There is so much that we still don't know about language. Intriguing, isn't it!


Further reading

Here's a couple of articles on bare coordination:

- Heycock and Zamparelli: Coordinated Bare Definites

- Bare_coordination_the_semantic_shift

  • 1
    It is, indeed, intriguing! Thank you! One question–I'm not sure where "he used to be cat" is coming from in your first list. Did you mean "Cat was filthy"? – 1006a Sep 9 '17 at 16:27
  • 2
    This is the third time you've posted a near-identical answer to duplicates. I was really impressed with this answer until I discovered this. Now I'm pretty disgusted. – Edwin Ashworth Sep 9 '17 at 16:32
  • 1
  • @1006a Oops, I just realised why it was that sentence and not the other! Those examples are all showing uncoordinated bare NPs as (ungrammatical) predicative complements. But in cat is filthy the NP cat is a subject, not a predicative complement, so I had to come up with a new example sentence. – Araucaria Sep 10 '17 at 11:49

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.