3

Is there a prefix meaning "at most" or "capped at"? I'd like to describe a spherical cap (Wikipedia, Wolfram) that is at most a hemisphere. The blue solid in the diagram below shows the type of cap I'm comfortable referring to as a subhemispherical cap (a term I just made up to differentiate from the red solid, which is also a spherical cap,) however 'sub-' is strictly less than, whereas I mean to say less than or equal to. I thought of subhemispherical cap or hemisphere, which depicts nicely that a hemispherical cap is in fact a hemisphere, but it does sound somewhat cleaner to call it a subhemi- or hemispherical cap (although the oddity of calling a hemisphere a hemispherical cap makes me prefer the former.) I list hemi- second both times as it is the edge case.

Still, what I really want is to combine the two into one term, i.e. [prefix]hemispherical cap. This would avoid the awkwardness of those phrasings and would be an easily repeatable phrase in a paper.

By the way I do find unfortunate that the word cap here does not fit with the common English usage, synonymous with lid, if it did I could just call it a spherical cap.

Also this has to be easy to understand, if the prefix is too niche I can't use it (although I'd still be curious to hear it.)

Spherical Cap

EDITED: For extra clarity on what I want, what I came up with, and added an image.

  • The word maximally could suit your need -- a maximally hemispherical cap. – Yosef Baskin Jul 24 '17 at 16:43
  • Thanks @YosefBaskin, I kinda like it! +1 for being a mathematical adjective. Although it does seem very slightly awkward, as in it's not entirely clear from your usage that 'maximally' refers directly to 'hemi-'. (This is mostly why I was hoping for a prefix.) It's the best I've got for now though. – Haumed Rahmani Jul 24 '17 at 16:58
  • It's up to you. The adverb modifies hemispherical directly. It means an at-most-half-globe of a cap. – Yosef Baskin Jul 24 '17 at 17:01
  • This doesn't work. If something is "maximally X", that means it is as X as it could possibly be, not that it varies with a maximum of X. – eyeballfrog Jul 24 '17 at 18:21
  • True, that's something else I couldn't put my finger on. Especially mathematically that would be implying that it is as hemispherical as possible (a useless thing to say.) – Haumed Rahmani Jul 24 '17 at 19:05
1

You could say that the cap is within or inside of the hemispherical cap: Endohemispherical cap

End- meaning inside of or within, as in
endorse, endocardial, endergonic, endoskeleton, endoscope, endogenous

Source: https://www.quia.com/files/quia/users/skrichard/ComSkills2/RootsPrefixesSuffixes

  • Thanks, seems the best! Doesn't have the implications of sub- and is common enough to be understood. – Haumed Rahmani Jul 29 '17 at 14:03
1

Perhaps the language of topology would give you more scope than the language of spherical geometry, e.g.

  • The surface of the sphere is a set of points S

  • A partial cover of S a collection of subsets that contains
    some but not all of the points in S.

  • A bounded partial cover is a collection that satisfies some
    bound, e.g. on the shape, size, number of subsets, or any other
    property one might care to define.

  • A hemispherically bounded partial cover would then have the
    properties you are looking for, provided that you define
    "hemispherically bounded" in an earlier step.

This is not a single-word answer, but with such a definition you could then introduce a term of your own, such as a cup cover, and use it within the scope of your document.

I have to confess that this is a somewhat frivolous use of topological language, but it might do the job.

  • Thanks, a helpful view and rigorous! I think too much explanation is required though for my purposes :) – Haumed Rahmani Jul 25 '17 at 13:44
0

EDIT

Mathematically, you want to say where theta is <= 90 degrees.

By definition, a subset can also contain the entire set. By analogy, a sub-hemispherical cap can include the entire hemisphere. I would state this as a definition before using it.

  • Sorry, not sure if you understood what a spherical cap is, I added an image to clarify. Both the blue and red sections above are spherical caps; however, I want to include in my definition those that are like the blue, also include those that are half a sphere, and exclude those that are like the red. Including the half a sphere in the description is of mathematical importance. I did also already see that Q&A, while you could refer to the red section as a superhemispherical cap that is not what I was looking for. They do not seem to discuss an alternative to 'sub-' that includes the object. – Haumed Rahmani Jul 24 '17 at 20:11
  • I understood what a spherical cap was. But I did misunderstand that you were asking for a range of subsets. I edited my answer accordingly. – MikeJRamsey56 Jul 24 '17 at 23:35
  • @MikeJRamsey56 Good point about subsets, but regarding sub- as a prefix, I'm not sure I agree, sub- usually means below or under. As far as I can tell, "subset" is the only use of the prefix where it can include the complete entity as well. It seems to me that prefixing a word with sub- probably would imply anything under that level. That's my take at least. – RaceYouAnytime Jul 24 '17 at 23:52
  • Thanks @MikeJRamsey56 and RaceYouAnytime. It is a great point that that works at the least with 'subset', so given a definition before usage I could see that as being a proper term. I do agree though that generally it seems unintuitive and bears the connotation of a strict inequality. (Dictionary.com) Then again, 'cap' also used strangely, so it might be fair. :) In other words I'm not extremely enthused but I could see it working. Minus a prefix that means what I want, this could be the way to go. – Haumed Rahmani Jul 25 '17 at 0:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.