-1

I'm having trouble deciding whether to use the word was or were when following an "or" phrase.

For example:

It wouldn't be the first time Bob or Alice was/were confused.

My grammar education is telling me that "was" is correct, but my ear is telling me that "were" sounds better.

I suspect the answer is "was", however, I'm interested in common usage too. Which form is more popular?

closed as off-topic by Edwin Ashworth, David, Davo, Mark Beadles, choster Jul 12 '17 at 18:23

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

3

English does not have separate words for exclusive disjunction (.xor.) and inclusive disjunction (.or.). 'Or' often represents exclusive disjunction, which is singular (either A or B, but not both), so you should use 'was' instead of 'were'.

Sometimes the type of 'or' is ambiguous: "Do you like cats or dogs?" could be answered 'Cats', 'Dogs', 'Yes', or 'No'. The first two answers correspond to an 'exclusive or' interpretation, and the last two correspond to 'inclusive or'.

To make an 'inclusive or' statement, you can use the term 'and/or', whose truth table is the sum of .and. and .xor.

  • 1
    Interesting point about the inclusive and exclusive or (+1). However, even in the case of inclusive or, I'm not sure that justifies plural agreement where each 'operand' is singular. Can you please elaborate? – Lawrence Jul 10 '17 at 22:50
  • I don't know if it's even possible to use an inclusive 'or' in a subject phrase. Can anyone give an example that wouldn't be parsed as exclusive 'or'? (no nesting allowed) – AmI Jul 10 '17 at 23:09
-1

The link provided by sumelic is a very good one with some great rules.

However, I want to point out that the simplest rule to follow is if your object is plural then you would use "were". If the object is singular then you would use "was".

That being said, and even in the link provided, the example sentence of, "I was always delighted when my brother or one of my sisters was asked to do them.", would not be misinterpreted or look strange to native speakers if you swapped it for, "were". In our vernacular it's common to use either.

The main thing is you never use "was" for an obvious plural subject or "were" for an obvious singular subject/object.

Examples:

"We all was running around the yard having so much fun playing." - WRONG

"We all were running around the yard having so much fun playing." - CORRECT

"My brother and one of my sisters was attending church that day." - TECHNICALLY CORRECT

"My brother and one of my sisters were attending church that day." - STILL COMPLETELY ACCEPTABLE IN SPOKEN ENGLISH

"My brother and my sisters was known for going to church every Sunday." - WRONG

"My brother and my sisters were known for going to church every Sunday." - CORRECT

Just remember that if there is any question at all if the subject is plural then you should likely use "were". If there's anything at all that makes it appear singular then you should probably use "was".

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.