17

So my client is asking to quickly tell him if a certain task is doable. But there is no way of just quickly checking its feasibility except for actually performing the entire task. How do I intimate this thing in a nice but solid manner? Is there a phrase or something that would convey my position?

  • 8
    Say just that. Always be plain with your clients, they will thank you! – marcellothearcane Jun 30 '17 at 11:31
  • 3
    How about "I don't know". – Phil Sweet Jun 30 '17 at 19:16
  • It's the fundamental answer by turing to the decidability problem, of course. The halting theorem. – Francesco Jun 30 '17 at 20:19
  • This is a great question... – barbecue Jul 1 '17 at 22:31
41

The idiomatic expression, at least in the US, is "We won't know until we try."

  • 5
    To my (American) ear, this makes it sound like a very ambitious/kind of crazy project--Can we get to the moon in this decade? We won't know until we try! I don't know whether that's a good thing or a bad thing in this case – MissMonicaE Jun 30 '17 at 15:30
25

In the software world, we'd say that we'd have to create a proof of concept.

  • 1
    I really think this should be the accepted answer. To say you need to "do a proof of concept" conveys exactly what the original question is asking. – Mark Meuer Jun 30 '17 at 17:39
  • 14
    "Proof of concept" tends to mean a "scaffolded" version of a product. Many of the functions of the final product would be omitted. – Hot Licks Jun 30 '17 at 22:06
  • @HotLicks While you need to do the whole task you very well might not need to do the whole task to the whole set of inputs. Do A, B, C when the true project will need 3x A, 2x B, 4x C. – Loren Pechtel Jul 2 '17 at 4:04
19

"There's (only) one way to find out" with or without the word "only" kind of indicates "the best way to see what will happen is to try it"

  • 1
    I think this is the best answer, but I don't know why you put "only" in parentheses. I've never heard anyone say "There's one way to find out", so the word "only" presumably always goes there, no? – Hack-R Jul 2 '17 at 14:32
  • It's commonly used either way, with or without the "only". The reason to insert "only" in this case is to emphasize the point the OP wishes to make. – Lee Mosher Jul 2 '17 at 14:40
5

An informal alternative to Hot Lick's contribution is

suck it and see UK informal - Cambridge Dictionary

to try something to find out if it will be successful: I'm not sure whether this paint is the right colour for the bedroom - we'll just have to suck it and see.

The phrase is in common use in Australian English. It might come across as off-colour on first presentation, but I think the imagery is derived from the taste-testing of confectioneries (e.g. lollipops): the only way to know how exactly it tastes is to sample it. I've highlighted the phrase in the usage instances quoted below.

Here's an instance of the phrase as a title in The Economist, a mainstream publication for the financial industry. The use of the phrase as a pun (in an article about a vacuum-cleaner entrepreneur) supports the assertion that the phrase is widely used.

Here are a few more instances of the phrase in use in a positive light:

And finally, here's the phrase used in a client brochure. It portrays the approach in a negative light and is further evidence of the phrase's acceptance in a commercial setting:

  • The secret to getting the most out of a CDN campaign is to create content that is share-worthy. You can’t afford to take a suck-it-and-see approach. - Quantum Linx
  • 13
    Thanks. "Suck it" sounds a bit too informal for a client though. :D – dotNET Jun 30 '17 at 12:03
  • 1
    I would say this is more than informal. I'd be offended and question the professionalism of someone who used that phrase. – Mark Meuer Jun 30 '17 at 17:41
  • 6
    I think this may be informal in the UK, but in the US 'suck it' is used almost exclusively as an abbreviation of a very vulgar phrase, and would almost certainly not be acceptable. – kingfrito_5005 Jun 30 '17 at 20:56
  • 2
    @kingfrito_5005 In Australia, it's a common expression. – Lawrence Jun 30 '17 at 22:16
  • 1
    @MarkMeuer I've added several usage instances where the phrase is used as described. – Lawrence Jun 30 '17 at 22:45
1

One way of explaining the situation, is by saying that the question cannot be answered without first doing a pilot study / feasability study. In this case, the pilot study would obviously include virtually completing the project itself, but it might still be a way of explaining by using terms that are fairly well known.

0

If you want to be unambiguous, "You can only know [try, know if it will work] by trying it."

protected by tchrist Jun 30 '17 at 23:23

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.