A: It had become sufficiently developed
B: It had sufficiently become developed
As far as I know, both forms are correct but my question is what does each sentence put more emphasis on?
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
Being the degree to which something has been developed, it focuses on the degree of development achieved rather than the process involved, and is placed next to the word developed: 'It had become sufficiently developed.' / 'It had become developed sufficiently to allow the commencement of the next phase.' – Edwin Ashworth
"Sufficiently" does not modify the verb phrase, but is in construction with the adjective "developed", which it modifies, to form the adjective phrase "sufficiently developed", and hence should occur adjacent to it. – BillJ
Compare bought all: "bought almost all" = definitely bought most, but "almost bought all" can describe collecting everything but changing their mind just before the checkout, buying nothing. – Lawrence
Is its becoming (developed) sufficient, or is what it is becoming a state of sufficient development? Two different meanings. – Drew
Considering all these comments, I realised "sufficiently" discribes the quality of 'development' here. In example B, however, "sufficiently" describes the quality of 'becoming' developed.
It had become sufficiently developed = the development it had achieved was sufficient
It had sufficiently become developed = the process of becoming developed was sufficient
Thanks to all those who commented!