0

This question already has an answer here:

I've a similar question concern the Dutch Language, but I couldn't find any dutch forum which actually discusses the Dutch language (with actual quite a lot members), so I thought let's ask her.

Yesterday I was asked I worked for < company name > or at < company name > . But what's the difference? Is it really that for a company means you can be hired to do something, and working at a company it really means you are working at and for that specific company?

So let's say I'm a freelancer and I'm hired to work for Facebook, so I am actually working for facebook. But if you have a contract at Facebook and they pay your montly salary and so on, you are actual working at Facebook. Is this correct?

And can somebody tell me the same rule counts for dutch as well?

marked as duplicate by Andrew Leach Jun 2 '17 at 16:45

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

migrated from linguistics.stackexchange.com Jun 2 '17 at 14:16

This question came from our site for professional linguists and others with an interest in linguistic research and theory.

  • 1
    If you work for Facebook, Facebook is a benefactive. If you work at Facebook, Facebook is a locative. – WavesWashSands Jun 2 '17 at 9:07
  • This would probably be better suited to English Language & Usage – Benjamin McAvoy-Bickford Jun 2 '17 at 10:42
  • You work AT a place and FOR an employer. Simple. – Lambie Jun 2 '17 at 14:18
  • Dutch is entirely off-topic on a site about English. – Andrew Leach Jun 2 '17 at 16:45
0

I'm a native Dutch speaker; and my job is one of the few where there is actually a difference between the two. So I hope this answers your question.

First of all, you're right in identifying that English and Dutch work the same way in this regard. For the purpose of staying on topic for English.SE, my answer only contains the English version; but you can assume that the same applies to Dutch.


I work at Google

You are telling me that the location of your work is Google (presumably headquarters, although any other official site of Google fits the description).

I work for Google

You are telling me that the work you perform is for Google. This doesn't inherently mean that you work at Google's headquarters (or any other official site of Google).

In the majority of cases, both apply at the same time. Most people work in the office/factory of their employer.


However, I'm a consultant. I work for MyCompany. ClientCompany1 signs a contract with MyCompany (temporarily hiring my services), and I go to ClientCompany1's offices to perform my job.

So for me, it would be correct to say:

I work for MyCompany; and I work at ClientCompany1.

Other examples could include:

I work for the Russian government as a spy, and I work at the NSA.
I work for Google, but I work at home (although "from home" is better in this specific case).


Whenever you say

I work at Google.

You are actually saying

I work at Google's office.

It doesn't have to be an office, it could be a factory, headquarters, a store franchise, ... This is either obvious from context, or irrelevant for the purpose of what you're trying to communicate.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.