0

I understand inversion but I have a difficulty when it comes down to "there."

A: Under the window there stood a vase. B: Under the window stood a vase.

Here my teacher said that option B is correct.

C: Under the window there was a vase. D: Under the window was a vase.

And here he said that option A is correct.

Could someone explain why I can't say option D?

marked as duplicate by Edwin Ashworth, JJ for Transparency and Monica, Xanne, jimm101, Chappo Says Reinstate Monica Jul 1 at 6:20

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
    Your teacher is mistaken. Options A, B, C, and D are all acceptable. If your teacher provided a reason for preferring B and C, we would need to know what he or she provided as reasoning in order to analyze further. – RaceYouAnytime May 27 '17 at 18:06
  • He didn't provide any explanations. He just said these two options were correct because "this is how it should be." – applepie192 May 27 '17 at 18:11
  • Then you should challenge your teacher to provide a reason for this, because any expert on the English language would say that all of the provided options are acceptable. – RaceYouAnytime May 27 '17 at 18:13
  • Can't put my finger on it but A and D sound kind of weird. Definitely not wrong but I never speak like that in casual conversation. – Slava Knyazev May 27 '17 at 18:18
  • 2
    They are all correct. But I suspect your teacher doesn't like D because they think a preposition phrase cannot function as a locative complement in an inverted construction. But it can, locational complements like "A vase is on the table" ~ "On the table is a vase", and "A letter was on the table" ~ "On the table was a letter" are grammatically okay, though the non-inverted versions are the norm. – BillJ May 27 '17 at 18:56
2

A. Under the window there stood a vase.

This is a presentational construction using a dummy there as Subject. The Locative Adjunct has been fronted. If we didn't have the fronting it would read:

  • There stood a vase under the window.

B. Under the window stood a vase.

This is an example of Subject-Complement inversion. Here we see the Locative Complement of the verb STAND has swapped places with the indefinite Subject a vase. The sentence would otherwise read:

  • A vase stood under the window.

C. Under the window there was a vase.

This is an existential construction in which the Locative Complement has been fronted. It would otherwise read:

  • There was a vase under the window.

D. Under the window was a vase.

Again, this is an example of Subject-Complement inversion. This time with the verb BE instead of the verb STAND.

All four of these examples are completely grammatical. They all demonstrate strategies for avoiding using indefinite noun phrases as Subjects at the beginning of sentences. English speakers tend to avoid using indefinite noun phrases at the beginning of sentences where they can. This makes them easier for listeners to process.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.