4

With all due respect is an idiomatic expression which has been used with he following meaning since the 19th century:.

  • This phrase always precedes a polite disagreement with what a person has said or brings up a controversial point. [c. 1800] (From AHD)

but according to the following extract from the Grammarist its meaning has changed in recent years and its usage now suggests a sarcastic and possibly disrespectful tone:

  • With all due respect has become an overused phrase, it is now often used sarcastically to mean the exact opposite of what it states. Political debaters and others may preface a rebuttal to an argument with, with all due respect. In this case, a subtle disrespect is intended.

  • In 2008, the Oxford dictionary compiled a list of the most irritating phrases in the English language, the phrase with all due respect came in as the fifth most irritating phrase in the English language. Perhaps because of its changing function from a phrase meant to mitigate hard feelings to a phrase that allows a subtle disrespect, cloaked in courtesy.

The same topic is discussed also in the following extract from The writing tips:

But in popular culture, the expression has become associated more with insult than with respectful deference:

  • Bill, with all due respect, you’re an idiot. –Stephen Colbert to Bill O’Reilly

  • Amanda Marcotte – With All Due Respect, You Are A Moron. –Blog headline.

  • When do you plan on submitting your resignation? I ask this with all due respect. –Blog reader responding to request for questions for Senator Richard Durbin.

The 2006 movie Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby, may have influenced the popularity of “with all due respect” used to introduce a blatantly disrespectful and offensive comment. At least twice in the movie, Ricky Bobby says something extremely vulgar to his team owner. He has the mistaken notion that prefacing a remark with the expression “with all due respect” gives a speaker license to insult and offend.

Questions:

  • Has the meaning of this old expression mainly changed to a sarcastic idiom?

  • What alternative analogous idiomatic expression could now be used instead to avoid possible misunderstandings?

  • 5
    I don’t think it’s generally sarcastic. That doesn’t seem like a good word to describe it. Hollow, overused, hackneyed, sure. But there’s no irony or sarcasm—at least not to me—in masking disrespect with euphemistic politesse. – Janus Bahs Jacquet May 13 '17 at 10:40
  • (1) I can't think of a situation where I've heard it used without judging it to be either sarcastic or highfalutin (or both) in the last 30 years. (2) I can't think of many times I've heard it used in the last 30 years. //// (3) Hedges abound. 'I've heard it said that ...' // 'Some people believe/would say/say that ...' // 'Another point of view is that ...' / 'What do you think of those top scientists who say that ...'. – Edwin Ashworth May 13 '17 at 10:41
  • 2
    'This phrase always precedes a polite disagreement with what a person has said or brings up a controversial point.' How do GNgrams reflect usage in spoken English? Conversational use and use in print are almost non-comparable; there's a built-in hedging with the latter. – Edwin Ashworth May 13 '17 at 10:53
  • 3
    @EdwinAshworth US Sen. Bernie Sanders uses this phrase a lot, often clearly with sincerity, as when he said it to Erin Burnett, and often not so sincerely, as when he used it in a tweet about Trump. Maybe his age has something to do with it. cnn.com/2016/09/26/politics/… – RaceYouAnytime May 13 '17 at 12:56
  • 2
    I'd say it's more double-edged than sarcastic, and what I see shifting is what we assume to have been elided. Once upon a time the phrase might have been parsed as with all due respect [to your high station and acknowledged intelligence] but nowadays I think it's at least as likely to mean with all due respect [to you—which is to say, virtually none, you buffoon]. – 1006a May 13 '17 at 20:17
3

I think the phrase "with all due respect" has always been problematic when used as a preface for criticism. OED describes it as a variant of "with all respect" or "with great respect." The latter phrases imply that the speaker respects the entity being addressed, regardless of the situational dissent. "With all due respect" can really mean anything -- it could imply that the speaker believes the entity is owed no respect whatsoever, or that they are owed great respect, or anything in between. An idiomatic phrase with meaning that depends totally on context is naturally irritating.

I would argue that this is not new. Consider this piece in The New York Times, where a judge interrupts an attorney by sarcastically parroting the phrase twice, from 1896.

enter image description here

On the other hand, it certainly seems likely, based on the Grammarist article and the other sources the OP provided, that the phrase is used more often in a sarcastic way today than it was in the past. I think it's notable though that the most extreme cases of sarcasm are by comedians and bloggers. The phrase is still active with sincere intent as well. Perusing a Google News search on the phrase reveals numerous instances where the speaker or writer is not being sarcastic. I found these three articles published within the last 24 hours.

With all due respect to the Lions, who play a nice brand of football and aren't a bad team at all, it will be ridiculous, bordering on wrong, should they end up being crowned Super Rugby champions in 2017.

There's a new show that premiered three weeks ago on Comedy Central at 11:30 p.m. every Thursday called The President Show and, with all due respect to the SNL troupe, this show is even funnier and more relentless than anything we've seen elsewhere.

“We saw a guy at Vanderbilt that was a productive guy, but, with all due respect to Vanderbilt, this is a whole different ballgame," Texans coach Bill O'Brien said.

Is the phrase irritating and better off omitted? I would say so, and apparently, a lot of people agree. Is it often used in a sarcastic or insincere way? That seems undeniable.

Whether or not it is mainly a sarcastic expression is difficult to measure, but I'll summarize with two points:

  1. The phrase has been pretty meaningless and irritating for quite some time.

  2. The phrase is still used often without sarcasm.

  • I agree with your second point, though the sources I cite appear to suggest the opposite. As for point one, I think the idiom is still among the "irritating" ones. – user66974 May 14 '17 at 7:36
  • @Josh I'm not arguing that it isn't irritating, but rather that it might have been irritating even before recent use. I think the sarcastic uses are a response to how the phrase is hollow and overused. When a comedian says "with all due respect, you're a moron," they're taking advantage of the phrase's flexibility by essentially saying "I don't think you're due any respect at all." They're also mocking the way the term is overused in politics, which was Colbert's schtick for a long time. So the sarcastic use is more an additional meaning than a replacement for how it was used historically. – RaceYouAnytime May 14 '17 at 15:57
  • I have been using 'with due respect' here in many situations to preface an expression of disagreement with somebody's opinion, as in "with due respect to username1234, that is not at all what OP intended" or "@username5678 with due respect, your comment might easily be misinterpreted." I think it is an expression of routine politeness as used here to preface a 'friendly argument'. However it can also preface a very hostile (yet icily polite) statement. Sarcasm does not seem apparent. Do many members at EL & U use "with due respect" or "with all due respect" to preface their statements? – English Student May 24 '17 at 0:44
  • @EnglishStudent part of my argument is that the phrase is not necessarily sarcastic, so I don't think there's a problem with how you use it. The point I was getting at is whether it's a useful phrase or if it's become somewhat meaningless because of overuse or ironic use. For instance, I could have started this comment by saying, "with all due respect," but often if a statement is phrased in a respectful way, that preface is less necessary. As a somewhat meta-example, I hope you realize by the fact that I responded that I respect your point, even though I'm not explicitly saying so. :) – RaceYouAnytime May 24 '17 at 0:52
  • Very true! According to the earlier definition the statement was always used with respect before a polite disagreement. What I would like to know is (1) are many people using 'with due respect' on this website and (2) if a highly hostile (yet not vulgar) statement follows, as in "@user765432 with due respect to your intelligence, your attitude is highly prejudiced and offensive; you have no absolute right to expect an answer, because we are not simply waiting here to look up grammar rules for your benefit!" would disrespect actually be intended by the preface rather than 'due' respect? – English Student May 24 '17 at 1:01
1

"With all due respect" is ambiguous. The phrase shouldn't be used in polite conversation. I'd dislike it if I was sitting at an event and have somebody said that to me. I'd expect it if I was throwing popcorn at the back of their head!

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy