To my knowledge,

There is no single word that describes a "person who has lost a child."

We have "widow" and "widower" for a person whose spouse had died. We have "orphan" for a child whose parent or parents have died. Source

According to the quora question, the closest word is in Arabic: ثَكْلَى (thakla) which translates as "bereaved mother."

Though bereaved does not adequately describe 'loss of child' as it's definition is:

[to] be deprived of a loved one through a profound absence, especially due to the loved one's death.

My questions are:

  • If there is a word, what is it?
  • If there is not a word, what word would Shakespeare have made up to convey the idea?

There are a number of related, now-obsolete terms that Shakespeare might have used, all related to the Latin orbus meaning bereavement. These include most notably1

† orbity, n. Obs. A bereavement, esp. the loss of a child; the state or condition of being bereaved. Also (esp. in later use): childlessness. [Attestations from 1597 to 1804]

† orb, adj. Obs. rare. Childless. [Only two attestations, one in 1607—spelled orbe—and one in 1660]

Neither of these is an exact parallel for terms like widow or orphan, however. Interestingly, the latter of these shares an Indo-European root with orbus. Perhaps Shakespeare could have coined a parallel term orban for parents bereaved of their child(ren).

Alternatively, some compound term might work; perhaps something like orbe- mother for a bereaved mother.2

1 Definitions from the Oxford English Dictionary: OED Online, Oxford University Press, March 2017.

2 Other possibilities, but these are pure invention: orbant or orphent, combining orb or orphan and parent; orbither, combining orb/orbity with mother/father.

Unfortunately, many possible options are problematic for modern English-speakers, due to the similarity to the unrelated words orb and orbit. One possible solution would be to stick closer to the Latin, for example mater orba or orba mater. A question on the Latin SE might get more plausible suggestions along these lines.

  • How is this relevant to contemporary English? – Lambie Apr 8 '18 at 15:36
  • @Lambie the OP asked what word would Shakespeare have used. – Mari-Lou A Apr 8 '18 at 15:46
  • @Mari-LouA Actually, it says what word would Shakespeare "have made up". Also, there are several searchable, full-text Shakespeare sites. So, it's a guess, right? – Lambie Apr 8 '18 at 15:56
  • @Lambie, the body of the answer is not a guess, it's part of the attested history of the language. I took the reference to Shakespeare to mean the OP was interested in archaic/obsolete terms from approximately Elizabethan times, in addition to current terms. The site allows questions about the history of the language. The "guesses" are in a footnote, as they are, in fact, purely opinion, which is not a great fit for the site. – 1006a Apr 8 '18 at 16:28

protected by Mari-Lou A Apr 8 '18 at 15:45

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.