I was wondering about a sentence like this:

  1. If nature were to design a bicycle, how would it look?

Is nature missing an article? Should it be a nature or the nature, or is it correct as is?

  1. If a nature were to design a bicycle, how would it look?
  2. If the nature were to design a bicycle, how would it look?

Could you also explain why?


Nature, in this context, means "Mother Nature", so it's more of a proper name in this case, which never requires an article.

'Nature' can also mean "a defining trait" as a general noun, such as "Human nature". In those casees, articles are possible, such as in

it is the nature of the scorpion to sting

I can't think of an example where one would use "a nature", with an indefinite article, except in compound words such as

He is a nature lover

in which case the article refers to the "lover" part, of course.

| improve this answer | |

There are several of these words that spring to mind :)

Compare for instance

All earth's children are beautiful. Earth's atmosphere protects it. We only have one earth, we should cherish it.

Or, slightly in a different direction:

God's creation is beautiful. Many a god lived on Olympus. The god of small things.

When used without an article, we refer to the entity or idea as a personification of that idea or entity. With an article we refer to it as either a specific instantiation or physical representation of the idea.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    "We only have one earth" does not work as an example. The article is absent because of the presence of one. It has nothing whatsoever to do with what noun follows. – RegDwigнt Oct 18 '13 at 10:38

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.