2

Which is correct:

A laser was used where the wavelength was 15 cm.

Or

A laser was used, where the wavelength was 15 cm.

(Note the comma before where)

More generally, do we use a comma before "where" and "in which"?

"In which" example:

X-ray diffraction uncovered an in-plane texture, in which gold preferentially aligned with sapphire.

or

X-ray diffraction uncovered an in-plane texture in which gold preferentially aligned with sapphire.

  • In your "where" sentence, we would not insert a comma. Meanwhile, I would need to see a sentence in which "in which" were used to better help you, but on the whole, also no. Also, I would have said, "...was used when the wavelength...." – Teacher KSHuang Apr 10 '17 at 11:46
  • In your second example, I think "preferentially" is not the right word. Or if it is, many of the other words need to change. – Mr Lister Apr 10 '17 at 11:50
  • Since the second part 'gold preferentially aligned with sapphire' describes the 'X-ray diffraction uncovered an in-plane texture', a comma is appropriate. – marcellothearcane Apr 10 '17 at 11:53
  • @MrLister is correct, maybe 'in which gold is preferentially aligned with sapphire' would be better? – marcellothearcane Apr 10 '17 at 11:54
  • 3
    Arguable at worst, not wrong at best. Personally I would re-write the first to something like "A laser with 15 cm wavelength was used" but I wouldn't object to seeing it as you've written without the comma. I prefer the second sentence without a comma as well and think preferentially is perfectly fine as-is. But, I understand that not everyone is as comfortable with giving agency to things in this way. – MDHunter Apr 10 '17 at 12:04
4

Use a comma before non-restrictive clauses, and don't use a comma before restrictive clauses. See this webpage.

How do you know whether a clause is restrictive or non-restrictive? It's restrictive if the information is essential, and limits the scope of the thing it's modifying. It's non-restrictive if the information is non-essential. For both of your sentences, the clause can be analyzed as either restrictive or non-restrictive, so in cases like this, the comma is optional.

  • 1
    A comma may be optional, but in the laser pair, the first means that in cases where the wavelength was 15cm a laser was used (and presumably something else in other cases), while the second means that a laser was used, and that the wavelength of that laser was 15cm. – mattdm Nov 26 '17 at 21:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.