For a poem I'm writing for my English class, in order to fit in some consonance, I plan on saying

Many millions of miles

But I am wondering if this is correct grammar, as millions already implies that it is more than one, and many would become redundant. Can anybody point me in the right direction?

  • 1
    "Many" would, in fact, be redundant. Consider that the entire planet's circumference is only about 26,000 miles.
    – Ricky
    Mar 28, 2017 at 5:45
  • @Ricky I'm writing it about the distance from the sun to the moon, though, so is it still redundant? Mar 28, 2017 at 5:47
  • Yeah, kind of. Besides, it's only 90 million miles. It ain't that far. I mean, you might as well say, "Many huge and tremendous millions of miles." Well, that's just my opinion. Maybe you should wait for others to reply.
    – Ricky
    Mar 28, 2017 at 6:00
  • 1
    I agree with @Ricky "Many" would be redundant, it's already "millions of miles". But as you're writing poetry and if you are looking for emphasis, I guess you could put it in there. But I wouldn't write it in a regular sentence.
    – Rio1210
    Mar 28, 2017 at 6:23
  • When you say "many" its more than can easily counted in a glance... millions might mean 5 million ... probably more than a "few", and definitely more than a "couple". I think people would say 10s of millions if they meant 20 or 50 million.for more ?' almost a 100 million'. Millions and millions to me would mean 100s of millions..something short of a billion ..maybe, maybe not.. it's trying to be uncountable at that point. My opinion.. but I'd definitely hear 'many millions" to mean more than millions. Language is what it means to people.. dictionaries are lagging indicators.....
    – Tom22
    Mar 28, 2017 at 7:33

3 Answers 3


There's nothing wrong with many millions — you are contrasting the amount with a few millions.

It's more likely to be used with money, I think, than distance: "The country has spent many millions of pounds repairing roads", and the value comes somewhere between a few million pounds and hundreds of millions of pounds.

Here's an Ngram. The top line is "many millions of"; the bottom line is "few million":

enter image description here

We can also add "hundreds of millions" for comparison. It's the green line which ends up on top:

enter image description here

  • Given the approach of your answer, it may be worth noting that noting is necessarily wrong with probable redundancy. Despite being seemingly redundant due to using the same word twice, Millions upon millions isn't entirely inconsiderable form, and it seems quite redundant, at least in form, although I suppose in a strict sense, it might mean no less than four million and implies many more.
    – Tonepoet
    Mar 28, 2017 at 16:47

I would presently say no. It is not redundant. Consider just what the word redundant means:

  1. Superfluous; exceeding what is necessary.
  2. (of words, writing, etc) Repetitive or needlessly wordy.
  3. (chiefly Britain, New Zealand, Australia) Dismissed from employment because no longer needed; as in "rendered redundant".
  4. Duplicating or able to duplicate the function of another component of a system, providing back-up in the event the other component fails.[1]

Given these definitions, it seems to me that you would effectively need to mean the same thing twice at least twice in order to be redundant, unnecessarily. That is unless you pay the words you employ wages. However, in this sentence, you mean two very different things.

The word many is being used as a quantifier2 to modify a noun, and the appropriate one to modify a pluralized, and hence count noun. It specifies you mean a higher number of that noun rather than a lower number of them.

  1. many Being or consisting of a large number of units or individuals; numerous: often used alone, the noun being understood. [3]

Although millions of can be used in a tropical sense to mean many, that is not what is happening here. You are using it in the very much more literal sense of the number you get if you multiply a thousand by another thousand.

MILLION, noun mil'yun. [Latin mille, a thousand.]

  1. The number of ten hundred thousand, or a thousand thousand. It is used as a noun or an adjective; as a million of men, or a million men. As a noun, it has a regular plural, millions.

  2. In common usage, a very great number, indefinitely. [4]

Given that a number can be considered type of unit5, it seems to fit well with the already provided definition of the word many.

If you do not add the grammatical quantifier, the reader is free to make their own assertions, and might assume you only traveled a few million miles. Consider this quotation from as demonstrating such an opposite is a possibility: "Which only shows how small the vastest of human catastrophes may seem, at a distance of a few million miles." — Tales of Space and Time by H. G. Wells

As such, the many is necessary unless you want the sentence to possibly mean something else, and thus, is not redundant.

Moreover, it only seems natural if you can apply a modifier needfully, its antonym would be able to do the same. As a matter of fact, a context very similar to the one you have specified is exemplified here:

In one way, we can see many trillions of miles, but, as we should expect, not very clearly. We can see the sun, and he is more than ninety millions of miles distant. Thus, when we gaze at him, we are seeing many millions of miles.[6]

My main reservation is just how many qualifies as many, and just how few qualifies as a few, but that's already the subject of a different question.

1 The wikitionary definitions from their Redundant entry, which is licensed under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license
2 See: The Farlex Book of Grammar's section on determiners.
3 The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia s.v. Many1
4 The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language by Noah Webster's definition of Million.
5 See: The American Dictionary of the English Language's definition of number
6 Seeing A Trillion Miles from Volume 92 of Popular Science Monthly in 1918 (I.S.S.N. 0161-7370)


In a poem, what "many millions" contributes to rhythm and lyric and sound may outweigh what it costs in precision of meaning and brevity.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.