1

The two-word sign "take free" in English is increasingly used in Japan to offer complimentary publications and other products. Is the phrase, which is considered kind of trendy in Japan, also used in English-speaking countries with the same meaning? Does it make sense to native English speakers? Is another phrase "take one free" a better choice of expression?

  • 2
    Yes; I'd say that even in headlinese, 'Take free' sounds very unnatural in BrE. – Edwin Ashworth Feb 21 '17 at 11:04
  • "Take free" gets a score of about 100 on my (quite sensitive) 和製英語 meter. – curious-proofreader Feb 22 '17 at 0:35
3

"Take free" is not a conventional expression in English and it's not grammatically correct either.

Here are some expressions which would be more commonly seen, on complimentary magazines and so on:

"Complimentary"

"Free"

"Free - take one"

"Please help yourself"

"Please take one"

Here's some real life examples:

enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

  • 2
    And... free for the taking (at least in American English) – AmE speaker Feb 21 '17 at 14:08
2

I live in the U.S. When people set a give-away out by the edge of the street for anyone to adopt, they usually write the following minimalist message, so they can write with really big, fat letters and use the whole space on their piece of cardboard:

FREE

This can also be used for free newspapers and advertising brochures, as one of J. Taylor's pictures showed.

1

As Japanese has no articles or concept of noun singular or plural, "Take Free" would not burden the ears of a native Japanese speaker.
It does burden the English speaker. The imperative "take" is clearly a verb, but it has no grammatical object. "Free" , alone, is hard to compute in English as an object, and probably wouldn't be one in any event. "Free" is just too much an adjective.

Take one free

is better.

Please take one

is fine

Free

would work as well. While "free", alone, has no article indicating a number, "free" alone creates no burden on the English speaker.

  • Thank you, everyone, for your great help. It's much clearer now. Teruko – Teruko Sato Feb 21 '17 at 12:34
  • 2
    'Take one free' sounds just as off. 'Free. Take one.' is OK – Mitch Feb 21 '17 at 14:14
-1

I would also add "free for the taking" to the list. But "take free" while sounding strange to native English speakers could be allowed for brevity.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.