2

I can't remember how the idiom goes, I believe the pattern is

verb adverb and adverb with [the truth]

I think verb is "play." I think the adverbs don't end in ly. Maybe the second adverb is "free."

The idiom means to distort.

I tried a dictionary of idioms but didn't find it.

  • 5
    Probably play fast and loose. – StoneyB Jan 17 '17 at 1:19
  • @StoneyB you should make that an answer. – barbecue Jan 17 '17 at 1:29
  • @StoneyB Thank you very much for your quick reply. That was it exactly. Please make an answer so I can hit "accept." I personally will not mind if you don't do a good job with documentation. – aparente001 Jan 17 '17 at 1:30
  • 1
    But documentation is the fun part of answering! – StoneyB Jan 17 '17 at 2:01
  • @StoneyB - some people hesitate to turn comments into answers because they're lazy, I guess. – aparente001 Jan 17 '17 at 4:01
3

Play fast and loose with X has been around a long time; it goes back to at least the 16th century. Robert Nares' magnificently titled A Glossary; or, Collection of Words, Phrases, Names, and Allusions to Customs, Proverbs, Etc., Which Have Been Thought to Require Illustration in the Works of English Authors, Particularly Shakespeare and His Contemporaries, 1822, derives it from

A cheating game, whereby gipsies and other vagrants beguiled the common people of their money. It is said to be still used by low sharpers and is called pricking at the belt, or girdle. It is thus described: ‘A leathern belt is made up into a number of intricate folds and placed edgewise upon a table. One of the folds is made to resemble the middle of the girdle, so that whosoever should thrust a skewer into it would think he held it fast to the table; whereas, when he has so done, the person with whom he plays may take hold of both ends and draw it away.’ —Sir J. Hawkins, [note on ‘Like a right gipsey, hath, at fast and loose, Beguil’d me to the very heart of loss.’ - Ant. & Cleo., IV, xii, 28.

In other words, you think you've got it pinned down, but you're wrong.

But I don't actually know that what follows is from that edition; this is quoted from Furness' New Variorum edition of KJ. I consulted A New Edition, with Considerable Additions Both of Words and Examples, by James O. Halliwell, Esq., F.R.S., &c., and Thomas Wright, Esq., M.A., F.S.A. 1858, and found a somewhat longer version there.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.