I've seen the phrase "... does not an honest man make" used, and wanted to know wheather this usage constitutes an idiom or sentance pattern.

Some example usages from the internet:

  • A long resume of lies does not an honest man make.
  • One good deed does not an honest man make?
  • Honesty in one small area of life does not an honest man make.
  • Making excuses for lying politicians does not an honest man make.

Is this just a special case of object-subject-verb word order (yodaspeak), or is it an idiomatic usage that creates special emphasis?

  • It is old-fashioned (but readily understood) and is often seen in quotations: "One swallow does not a summer make." (Aristotle)
    – Mick
    Nov 26 '16 at 19:47
  • 1
    Aristotle didn't write in Early Modern English. But Lovelace did. The structure is lifted from the last verse of "To Althea, from Prison": Stone walls do not a prison make, nor iron bars a cage. Note many other archaic features about this poem, including the half-rhymes and eye-rhymes. Nov 26 '16 at 20:28

You are right in thinking that OSV is a construction that changes the emphasis of the sentence. To demonstrate:

1: Do you like pasta?
2: Not really.
1: How about pizza?
2: Now that I like!

This is a feature of language called "Topic-fronting" that can occur in many languages. As you can see from the example the focus of the sentence is moved to the object "that". In this case, it also stresses that the response is different from the one that preceded it. In English, it's often used this way e.g

I despise most German composers, but Mozart I like!

I'll also add that the usage of OSV in English is mostly idiomatic. Limited to certain contexts and can come across as strange if overused in ordinary language. The most common context in which I see it used are contexts in which it might be appropriate to say something like "Now you're talking!". It carries a connotation of slight oratorical flair that might not be appropriate for, say, a dreary business meeting.

I should add that your example:

Making excuses for lying politicians does not an honest man make.

Is not an example of OSV topic fronting at all. In fact, what you've got is SVOS. Your sentence has two verbs. So perhaps a different example might be in order.

Making excuses makes an honest man.

This example is simply the standard SVO. Compare:

Making excuses an honest man makes.

This is a clear example of SOV, however, I doubt it would occur anywhere asides deliberately poetic or archaic-sounding language. On the other hand, the expression:

X does not a Y make.

Is also very idiomatic in English, and its use is almost exclusively restricted to sentences involving the verbs "to do" and "to make" plus a negation, although other verbs are possible. In many ways, the SOV formation is the very opposite of OSV, as it draws attention away from the object and places it on the verb. However, similarly, SOV is sometimes used to draw attention to the fact that what was said previously is now being contradicted. e.g

1: The expensive school my children attend should ensure they grow up to be gentlemen.
2: Expensive schools do not a gentleman make.

As before, I'd be wary of overusing these phrases if you're not a native speaker. They're highly situational, and if you overuse them you risk sounding pretentious.

  • There's a lot more than "topic fronting" involved. The "topic" may be moved to either end of the sentence, and may optionally leave a pronoun behind. Viz, Mozart, him I like (Left Dislocation); Mozart I like (Topicalization, aka Y-Movement); I like him, Mozart (Right Dislocation). Nov 26 '16 at 19:59
  • Feel free to add more explanation. I fear I've exhausted my expertise. Nov 26 '16 at 20:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.