Under what circumstances would I use one of these over the other?

Here is my current understanding/misunderstanding:

Agglomeration: This is a collection of unrelated items. For example: A white elephant stall could be an agglomeration of unwanted items.

Conglomeration: This is a collection of related items. For example: A conglomeration might be the parts of a dismantled motorbike.

  • I would say that the assembled motorbike is a conglomeration, not the box of components. I do carry some of the geology sense of the word over, and a conglomeration is something that has its own properties derived from the melding of the components, whereas an agglomeration does not have any identifiable properties as a whole.
    – Phil Sweet
    Nov 17, 2016 at 2:48

3 Answers 3


S.I. Hayakawa, Choose the Right Word: A Modern Guide to Synonyms (1968) discusses the two words in different groups of synonyms. Agglomeration appears with pile, heap, and mass:

pile, agglomeration, heap, mass. These words denote the result of processes through which things or particles are gathered together. ... Agglomeration, even more than heap, suggests a chance coming together of its parts, those parts being heterogeneous and not compacted, connected or consistent: [example omitted].

Conglomeration appears in two groups of synonyms—with accumulation, aggregation, and collection, and with jumble, farrago, hodgepodge, medley, mélange, mess, mishmash, muddle, olio, olla podrida, and potpourri. Here are the relevant comments from each discussion:

accumulation, aggregation, collection, conglomeration. All these words, as here considered, mean a mass of things that come or are brought together. They all imply that the things are neither merged with one another nor united organically in the resultant mass. ... Conglomeration implies that many different and sometimes even incongruous things are brought together from widely scattered sources or regions: [example omitted]

jumble, conglomeration, farrago, hodgepodge, medley, mélange, mess, mishmash, muddle, olio, olla podrida, and potpourri. These words are alike in referring to a disordered condition or to a confused or heterogeneous mixture of elements. ... Conglomeration and mélange refer to heterogeneous collections of things. Both words often carry critical overtones, suggesting that the collection is random or inapposite: [examples omitted].

This isn't a terribly enlightening treatment, especially as heterogeneous appears in all three discussions, and you get the sense that inconsistent, incongruous, and unrelated would as well.

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms (1984) discusses the terms side-by-side (under the entry for aggregate), to somewhat more useful effect:

Aggregate, aggregation, conglomerate, conglomeration, agglomerate, agglomeration denote a mass formed by parts or particles that are not merged into each other. ... Conglomerate and conglomeration emphasize the heterogeneousness of the components and often suggest their assemblage from a wide variety of sources; sometimes either is applied to a heap of things, sometimes to an aggregate in which the arts are clearly distinguishable [examples omitted] Agglomerate and agglomeration in general use seldom imply coherence of parts; they suggest either a huddling together or often a fortuitous association [example omitted] In geology agglomerate designates a rock aggregate composed of irregularly shaped fragments scattered by volcanic explosions as distinguished from conglomerate, an aggregate composed of rounded, waterworn stone.

My impression is that the components of an agglomeration come together even more thoroughly by chance than the components of a conglomeration do, although in both instances the resulting collections of things are irregular, unpredictable, and seemingly undirected. The two words have quite different meanings as used in geology, but those distinctions don't seem to carry over to the way people use agglomeration and conglomeration in other contexts.

  • Do you think it would be safe to say that a conglomeration is a defined subset of an agglomeration. I.e. I have a group of random things (agglomerate) and I select all the mechanical things in it (congromerate)?
    – BanksySan
    Nov 17, 2016 at 11:02
  • 1
    @BanksySan: You could make a case for distinguishing between the two sets of things in that way, but I would avoid the suggestion that conglomerations in general are derived from agglomerations. It may be more accurate to say that a conglomeration tends to be less random than an agglomeration—and leave it at that. In many instances, I suspect, either term could reasonably be applied to a mass of things collected largely on the basis of happenstance or fortuitous opportunity.
    – Sven Yargs
    Nov 17, 2016 at 19:05

This is a good question, and the two words are indeed similar.

According to Cambridge Dictionaries Online, there is a small difference between the two, however:

agglomeration n.

A large group of many things collected or brought together

an agglomeration of various ethnic and religious groupings

conglomeration n.

A large group or mass of different things all collected together in an untidy or unusual way

There was a strange conglomeration of objects on the mantelpiece.

  • That looks sort of inline wig what I thought. I hadn't considered the disorder qualifier though.
    – BanksySan
    Nov 16, 2016 at 23:04

Conglomeration and agglomeration are synonyms, except when used as geological or business terms. They are both disorganized masses. The word conglomerate is slightly older than agglomerate, and they both come from the Latin word for a ball of yarn. Interestingly, in Latin "ag' means to "adhere to", while "con" means "together with". So originally one may have meant the act of adding onto a ball of yarn, while the other refer to the assembled ball (i.e. a growing mass vs. a mass)...but this distinction doesn't seem to exist today.

  • Good answer but if you look at other answers you will see that it is necessary to cite references to support your answer.
    – Nigel J
    Nov 11, 2017 at 16:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.