1

I want to make a sentence, adequately using parallel structures, and can't find a way for that. I couldn't find an adjective for tobacco-relative, like I have for alcohol and automotive, in the following list:

tobacco, alcoholic and automotive goods

In a way I could write a phrase:

The new tax applies to tobacco, alcoholic and automotive goods.

Is there any way to make sentences like this parallel?

*Edited: I think the way I framed the question people would understand it as three different nouns; when I was actually meaning three different adjectives for goods. This is why I have provided an example phrase.

10
  • I would make the first two agree, and not worry too much about the last item, since it is separated from the others by a conjunction: "I sell tobacco, alcohol and automotive goods." It's not perfect but it's passable.
    – Mick
    Nov 16, 2016 at 19:57
  • I agree with @Mick. Plus, "alcoholic goods" is a bad phrase given that "alcoholic" has the primary sense of "someone addicted to alcohol."
    – DyingIsFun
    Nov 16, 2016 at 20:10
  • @Mick Nothing wrong with the parallelism you suggest. Three noun phrases. There is no count/non-count issue. Nov 16, 2016 at 22:54
  • @Mick I don't think he sells tobacco and alcohol, he sells tobacco-related products and alcohol-related products.
    – Barmar
    Nov 17, 2016 at 5:51
  • @Barmar I think you're wrong. 'tobacco: ... 3. Products made from these plants.' {AHD}. Likewise, the third sense AHD lists for 'alcohol'. Nov 17, 2016 at 16:09

1 Answer 1

2

I can see that you're looking for brevity, but it can compromise understanding or accuracy, so I suggest the following:

The new tax applies to goods in the following classes: tobacco, alcoholic, and automotive.

If the word 'classes' is not suitable for the circumstances you're referring to maybe 'groups' would be better. Regardless, by specifying that you are referring to classes/groups you make it clear that you are not literally referring to raw tobacco.

1
  • I apologize for the late feedback. I voted it up, as it would normally answer such question and I think it's really a good answer. I couldn't use it, though, as it was a translation, thus I had to sticky to the original phrase. Thanks anyway, @user69911 :D
    – Ágatha
    Jan 14, 2017 at 1:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.