0

I'm not sure if a comma should go in the following sentence:

I used to feed the ducks there when I was a kid, growing up in Ireland.

I also have another sentence similar to this:

I'm at the park, trying to get some exercise.

Would comma go in those two sentences? Why or why not?

  • The first sentence doesn't sound too well put together (I'm not speaking of the grammar). I'd certainly use a comma with your second example, though not necessarily with I'm trying to get some exercise at the park. – Edwin Ashworth Nov 9 '16 at 22:13
1

No comma is required in the first sentence. In fact, the comma you have seems to put a bad break into the sentence.

In the second sentence, the comma is OK, because it doesn't hurt; it comes as a natural pause in the rhythm of the sentence (which could be two separate sentences, or two clauses joined by "and"):

I'm at the park and trying to get some exercise. I'm at the park. I'm trying to get some exercise.

As always with commas, their use can't be proven like a math formula. Some just seem better than others. We use many times fewer commas today than in previous generations.

  • +1, and I might add that the "correctness" of a comma isn't wholly determined within a single sentence. A clever prose stylist can use commas to balance or contrast the ideas of adjacent sentences - as well as to highlight the importance of a phrase to the point being made. – ArchContrarian Sep 4 '17 at 23:22
  • ... for example, your first sentence seems ungainly on its own, but it might be fine followed by, "Now, as a pensioner in Hawaii, ...". And so on. – ArchContrarian Sep 4 '17 at 23:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.