I'm having trouble wording this sentence:
Several groundbreaking clinical and social science breakthroughs were made with the help of ...
Social science as a noun can't modify breakthroughs. Is there an alternative?
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
Can you please explain what exactly you mean by "Social science" in this context? Does it, for example relate to, say, a specific discipline? Such as anthropology, or sociology?
In this case, I think you can use something as below :
Several groundbreaking clinical and anthropological breakthroughs were made with the help of ...
If “Social science” is a noun then it can modify “breakthroughs” in the same way that “sociology” would, even though “sociological” would be far preferable. If it couldn’t, why would an adjectival hyphen in “… social-science breakthroughs” not do the trick? Failing both, how unhappy would you be with “social scientific” with or a without a hyphen?
Breakthroughs are not generally “clinical and scientific / social science…” Perhaps “Clinical and experimental”; maybe “Clinical and important”; possibly “Scientific and economic”; perhaps “Scientific and geographic”; maybe “Scientific and oceanic”.
What would be wrong with “Several groundbreaking clinical breakthroughs were made in (the field of) social science with the help of…”, please?