Can "very" be used as a multiplier? For instance: A house, a big house, a very big house, a very very big house meaning a bigger house than a very big house and so on.


You could use 'very' to give an indication about its comparative size to an average house, but as mentioned by @Mazz, this becomes boring really quickly if you're trying to write something you want people to read.

Using other adverbs as proposed by Mazz is an option, however it's better to use another adjective all together for readability and a more engaging text.

Smaller house: The tiny house (Instead of 'the very small house')

Small house: The small house

Normal house: The house

big house: The big house

bigger house: The huge house (instead of 'the very large house')

I hope this example helps you to deal with the use of 'very' and perhaps offers you some alternatives on what words to use instead of it. This is applicable for many adjectives, especially those that indicate size or some order of magnitude as with your house example provided in the question.

  • How far can you go this way? I mean: A house, A big house, A bigger house, A huge house, A huger house, An extremely big house, An extremely bigger house, An enormously big house, An enormously huge house, An extremely huge house, An extremely enormous gigantic house, An extremely huger ginormous house. I think this doesn't have an end? Am I looking at it the right way? – SovereignSun Nov 2 '16 at 8:24
  • 1
    True you could theoretically go infinitely far that way, but the thing is that there is a certain limit as to what is realistic and when you mention something like: 'Charly's eyes became big as dishes as he approached the collosal house in front of him. never in his life had he seen a mansion as large as this one.' At some point you have to trust the reader to be able to imagine what you're trying to convey. – Hyfnae Nov 2 '16 at 8:26
  • Russians have a good imagination ))) – SovereignSun Nov 2 '16 at 8:49

You can certainly do that, but be warned that it would be received as a very informal style of speech. One might say that the number of "very"s you place in front of a word will also modify the informality of the sentence. :)

If you don't want to change the adjective, as Hyfnae suggested (quite sensibly), you could also amplify the implied size by choosing a word that has a larger impact than "very", e.g.:

"It was a very large house."

"It was a remarkably large house."

"It was a terrifically large house."

"It was a strikingly large house."

"It was an extremely large house."

"It was an exceedingly large house."

"It was an unbelievably large house."

"It was an inordinately large house."

"It was an astronomically large house."

This would also allow you to imply more than just the size, as many of these words carry extra meanings, e.g. "inordinately" indicates not just that it's very large, but also that the speaker considers it to be too large.

You could also reduce the impact a little, while still increasing the impact vs. just saying it was a large house:

"It was an unusually large house."

"It was quite a large house."

  • I guess there doesn't exist a list of sizes? – SovereignSun Nov 2 '16 at 11:44
  • @SovereignSun Not really. English is a huge mishmash of other languages, formed over centuries. There is very little order to rely on when it comes to adjectives and adverbs. You simply need to learn, from context and dictionaries, what the various degrees and nuances are for each candidate word. Some definitions vary a little from person to person as well, so it's best to choose one that you hear often and which seems well-understood by all. – Aiken Drum Nov 2 '16 at 12:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.